Selon Armin Burger :
> Hi Even
>
> Thanks a lot again! I added the fix to the current 1.11.2 version and
> afterwards everything was fine, all layers in the FGDB v9 were found.
Cool. It would be usefull if someone could provide a as small as possible FGDB
v9 dataset to be used for regression test
Hi Even
Thanks a lot again! I added the fix to the current 1.11.2 version and
afterwards everything was fine, all layers in the FGDB v9 were found.
Cheers
Armin
On 03/15/2015 04:08 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Armin,
I've committed a fix in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5875 that should
hop
Armin,
I've committed a fix in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5875 that should
hopefully fix your issue. There was a problem with the presence of non spatial
tables that could cause later tables not to be listed. This wasn't specifically
related to feature classes.
Even
> Hi Even
>
> thanks f
Hi Even
thanks for the reply!
The FGDB dataset where I discovered that has unfortunately some
commercial IPR restrictions, so I cannot share it (and it in addition
has some 800 MB...). I will try to create a test FGDB with a similar
internal structure, I have to check if I can create an FGDB
Selon Armin Burger :
> Dear all
>
> I have a question regarding the OpenFileGDB driver in 1.11.2 release. It
> now lists also non-spatial tables as layers of an FGDB (as mentioned in
> the changelog). But it seems to not list any more layers that are
> "feature classes" under a parent "feature dat
Dear all
I have a question regarding the OpenFileGDB driver in 1.11.2 release. It
now lists also non-spatial tables as layers of an FGDB (as mentioned in
the changelog). But it seems to not list any more layers that are
"feature classes" under a parent "feature dataset" (that's how the
relati