Selon Tamas Szekeres :
> Hi Even,
>
> Thanks for the valuable comments, I've modified the patch in accordance with
> your suggestions.
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/attachment/ticket/4259/swq_op_general.cpp.patch
>
Looks good to me.
> Best regards,
>
> Tamas
>
>
>
> 2011/9/23 Even Rouault
>
> >
Hi Even,
Thanks for the valuable comments, I've modified the patch in accordance with
your suggestions.
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/attachment/ticket/4259/swq_op_general.cpp.patch
Let me know if you find something else that can be changed. I've just added
a warning if the conversion fails, but I'm
Le mercredi 21 septembre 2011 19:20:17, Tamas Szekeres a écrit :
> Hi Devs,
>
> We have some problems due to the recent changes in the SQL expression
> parser which is related to the change in the implicit type conversion
> behaviour.
>
> Formerly we could safely use the following statement:
>
>
No strong opinion/preference for me...
On 11-09-21 01:20 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
Hi Devs,
We have some problems due to the recent changes in the SQL expression
parser which is related to the change in the implicit type conversion
behaviour.
Formerly we could safely use the following stateme
Hi Devs,
We have some problems due to the recent changes in the SQL expression parser
which is related to the change in the implicit type conversion behaviour.
Formerly we could safely use the following statement:
select * from mytable where ogr_fid in ('1100','1101','1102')
If the data type of
