Re: Fwd: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support

2008-11-19 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Kurt Landrus wrote: Ok never-mind, I found the problem was I was using a comma, to delimit the tre-name and contents, and Franks note indicated an '=' was needed. The NITF documentation page needs to be updated to reflect this. Thanks; Kurt, Proposed updates are welcome. Send them directly t

Fwd: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support

2008-11-19 Thread Kurt Landrus
703-368-6107 x424 Lab:703-368-6107 x520 Begin forwarded message: From: Kurt Landrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 17, 2008 1:19:20 PM EST To: Frank Warmerdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support Ok thanks for your reply.

Re: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support

2008-11-17 Thread Kurt Landrus
Ok thanks for your reply. I downloaded the beta, and updated my code to use the options in the create fcn. I am now getting an error from the driver on the create call, for the options. I am creating the option with the TRE in the same format as loaded using GDAL. ### saving TRE SENSRA =

Re: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support

2008-11-13 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Kurt Landrus wrote: Ok, I was looking through nithfile.c, am I correct in understanding that the only TRE supported for saving is BLOCKA, and that each additional TRE needs to be handled individually? I need to add support for the following TREs. But I don't really need to add new SDE hea

RE: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support

2008-11-13 Thread Dan Greve
loper can provide feedback here... -- Dan Greve > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 > 11:40:14 -0500> Subject: [gdal-dev] NITF TRE support> > > Ok, I was looking > through nithfile.c, am I correct in understanding >

[gdal-dev] NITF TRE support

2008-11-12 Thread Kurt Landrus
Ok, I was looking through nithfile.c, am I correct in understanding that the only TRE supported for saving is BLOCKA, and that each additional TRE needs to be handled individually? I need to add support for the following TREs. But I don't really need to add new SDE headers, but preserve