Le mercredi 03 juin 2015 11:13:51, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As no points have been raised on the RFC itself (peripheral discussions on
> how to address out-of-range nodata values) :
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rf
+1
Daniel
On 2015-06-03 8:01 AM, Howard Butler wrote:
On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:13 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
As no points have been raised on the RFC itself (peripheral discussions on how
to address out-of-range nodata values) :
Motion : I move to adopt RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> As no points have been raised on the RFC itself (peripheral discussions on
how
> to address out-of-range nodata values) :
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc58_removing_dat
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 4:13 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As no points have been raised on the RFC itself (peripheral discussions on
> how
> to address out-of-range nodata values) :
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/
Hi,
As no points have been raised on the RFC itself (peripheral discussions on how
to address out-of-range nodata values) :
Motion : I move to adopt RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc58_removing_dataset_nodata_value
Starting with my +1
Best regards,
Ev
