William,
I have created the following ticket, please add any information there,
especially the patch to configure. I will see how to resolve that
issue on linux also.
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4424
The CF compliance checks (in netcdf_cf.py) can be skipped safely and
are optional, no need
OK, looking good, after patching configure to work around netcdf problems
mentioned.
Autotests generally OK. Netcdf tests OK, except I need to install cfchecker to
check CF compliance.
There are a bunch of new tiff_srs_* tests, many that fail. It's dropping some
TOWGS84 options, or some AUTH
OK, I have NetCDF now with HDF4/5 & DAP. Now configure problems again (again,
netcdf is static library, as are HDF4, HDF5 and DAP):
My netcdf needs curl (it defaults to using curl), but GDAL doesn't test netcdf
with that (curl is tested much later).
Netcdf4 also needs some symbols from libhdf5
Etienne,
For what it worth, I repeated the tests as for Windows in
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3166 and got the expected behavior.
Joaquim
Folks,
I would appreciate minimal testing for netcdf-4 in osx before
releasing rc2 (which should take a few days at the most).
Wiliam:
The drive
Folks,
I would appreciate minimal testing for netcdf-4 in osx before
releasing rc2 (which should take a few days at the most).
Wiliam:
The driver in 1.9 includes support for netcdf-4, which uses hdf5 for
storage and supports deflate compression as well as a new data model.
Other important bugfix
Folks,
To make it official, I'll vote -1 on promoting RC1 as final. I'll plan to
cut an RC2 in a couple hours. If there are any pending fixes needed
first please let me know as soon as possible. I can certainly put it off
a bit.
Best regards,
Frank
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Etienne Tour
+1 for a rc2, including fixes and netcdf-4 testing for osx and Even's bugfixes.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Selon Daniel Morissette :
>
>> On 12-01-01 11:30 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>> >
>> > *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've
>> fou
Selon Daniel Morissette :
> On 12-01-01 11:30 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
> >
> > *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've
> found
> > a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when
> > sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite
On 12-01-01 11:30 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
*Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've found
a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when
sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite 3.3.6, but we now
use various methods that
William,
Can you comment on the status of support for netcdf4 + hdf5 in mac osx
? Has that been tested, or is it possible to include them in your
builds?
There have been a number of improvements to the netcdf driver for
1.9.0 (including support for netcdf-4), it would be nice to have that
include
One configuration problem so far on OS X:
- with-freexl - doesn't test for freexl with libiconv (I have freexl compiled
as static library, so it doesn't automatically link libiconv). I just added
$LIBICONV to both the freexl tests to get this to work, but another test for
whether freexl needs
GDAL autotests are looking good on Win64. Futher tests are welcome.
Best regards,
Tamas
2012/1/2 Etienne Tourigny
> What is the status of Windows 32-bit and 64-bit ? Have they been
> tested outside of Tamas' build bot?
>
> best wishes for 2012,
> Etienne
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM,
What is the status of Windows 32-bit and 64-bit ? Have they been
tested outside of Tamas' build bot?
best wishes for 2012,
Etienne
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 02:38:00, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
>> Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 re
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 02:38:00, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
> Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 release candidate as
> the final GDAL/OGR 1.9.0 release.
>
I've managed to compile it (or the betas) on a variety of Unixes (CentOS 6.2,
Ubuntu 11.10, FreeBSD 8.0, NetBSD 5, Ope
Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 release candidate as
the final GDAL/OGR 1.9.0 release.
+1 Frank
--
I have done a wee bit of testing and the release candidate seems
solid. Other PSC members are encouraged to test and vote.
Feedback from other users is also welcome.
Voting w
15 matches
Mail list logo
