Changing my vote to -1. I've just discovered a few recent regressions of
3.9.1 that were not in 3.9.0 (last 2 commits of
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10267)
I'm going to prepare a 3.9.1RC2.
Le 20/06/2024 à 14:52, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi,
Motion:
Adopt GDAL 3.9.1RC1 as 3
Andrew,
As Greg said, 25 hours isn't long to test
There's also a 2 business days phase after the motion has been initiated
before declaring it passed, which will lead to us after the week end, so
if someone finds something critical enough, that can still be taken into
account. Hard to know i
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote:
Motion:
Adopt GDAL 3.9.1RC1 as 3.9.1 release
Starting with my +1
As Greg said, 25 hours isn't long to test
I've managed to build and run some tests on Ubuntu 24-04/Noble
using clang compilers (v18 as shipped by Ubuntu and/or v19 from ...
Even Rouault via gdal-dev writes:
> Motion:
>
> Adopt GDAL 3.9.1RC1 as 3.9.1 release
I haven't had a chance to test in the 24h59m between the rc and
proposing a release. Not sure when I will, but this interval seems
super short. Of the beyond-core-team people that usually test, has
anybody el
Javier +1
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 14:52, Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Motion:
>
> Adopt GDAL 3.9.1RC1 as 3.9.1 release
>
> Starting with my +1
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
>
+1 Howard
> On Jun 20, 2024, at 7:52 AM, Even Rouault via gdal-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Motion:
>
> Adopt GDAL 3.9.1RC1 as 3.9.1 release
>
> Starting with my +1
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> __
Hi,
Motion:
Adopt GDAL 3.9.1RC1 as 3.9.1 release
Starting with my +1
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-d