Ari Jolma kirjoitti 15.11.2017 klo 15:51:
Even Rouault kirjoitti 15.11.2017 klo 13:40:
On mercredi 15 novembre 2017 10:58:23 CET Ari Jolma wrote:
>
> Thus the return value of CPLGetXMLBoolean can't use CPLGetXMLValue
if it
> follows the logic of CPLFetchBool. That is true is existence an
Even Rouault kirjoitti 15.11.2017 klo 13:40:
On mercredi 15 novembre 2017 10:58:23 CET Ari Jolma wrote:
>
> Thus the return value of CPLGetXMLBoolean can't use CPLGetXMLValue if it
> follows the logic of CPLFetchBool. That is true is existence and no
denial.
>
Why not
CPLGetXMLBoolean(n
On mercredi 15 novembre 2017 10:58:23 CET Ari Jolma wrote:
> I thought it would be perhaps good to have CPLGetXMLBoolean since we
> have CPLFetchBool and many of the option values needed by the new WCS
> driver are boolean flags and the option values end up in the service
> XML. It would twist the
I thought it would be perhaps good to have CPLGetXMLBoolean since we
have CPLFetchBool and many of the option values needed by the new WCS
driver are boolean flags and the option values end up in the service
XML. It would twist the brain a bit less if one could simply use
CPLGetXMLBoolean.
Th
