In a well documented test, I found that gdal_translate processing of a 675 MB
image with --config GDAL_CACHEMAX 40 took 10,473 seconds, while processing with
--config GDAL_CACHEMAX 45 was 63 times faster!, taking only 166 seconds.
However, further increases in the GDAL_CACHEMAX did not effect pr
According to http://www.gdal.org/formats_list.html the maximum GDAL NITF file
size is 10 GB. Greg
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:24 AM, turtlewax wrote:
> 1. Is there a known limitation of NITF output?
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://
I'm seeing an issue with generating large NITFs 1GB+.
1. I've tried using "GDAL1.7dev" in Linux and "GDAL 1.7.2" in Windows.
2. The images are all 8-bit 3band.
3. I've tried going from
TIF --> NITF
Tiled-tif --> NITF
NITF --> NITF
4. In terms of validating the input data, I've l
