Hello,
I am investigating adding JPEG2000 in addition to the other compression
schemes we use internally in our software, and I was wondering if anyone had
some information about which of the JPEG2000 implementations offers the best
performance in GDAL, and additionally, on its own generally. We
ay, October 27, 2008 11:24 AM
> > To: Christiaan Janssen
> > Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] JPEG2000 question/issue
> >
> > Christiaan Janssen wrote:
> > > I'm wondering if someone can help me with this. I'm trying to build
> > &g
ehalf Of Frank Warmerdam
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 11:24 AM
> To: Christiaan Janssen
> Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] JPEG2000 question/issue
>
> Christiaan Janssen wrote:
> > I'm wondering if someone can help me with this. I'm tryin
Christiaan Janssen wrote:
Actually, I want the MrSID library to handle JPG2000 instead of the ECW
library, while still maintaining support for standard ECW files. I think what
your describing would be the opposite.
Christiaan,
Ah, then set GDAL_SKIP=JP2ECW.
Best regards,
--
---
, October 27, 2008 11:24 AM
To: Christiaan Janssen
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] JPEG2000 question/issue
Christiaan Janssen wrote:
> I'm wondering if someone can help me with this. I'm trying to build
> GDAL with both support for MrSID and ECW while using the forme
Christiaan Janssen wrote:
I'm wondering if someone can help me with this. I'm trying to build GDAL
with both support for MrSID and ECW while using the former for JPEG2000
support. It appears that as soon as libecw is linked in, it is being
used as the JPEG2000 reader (even when I have MRSID_FLA
I'm wondering if someone can help me with this. I'm trying to build GDAL with
both support for MrSID and ECW while using the former for JPEG2000 support. It
appears that as soon as libecw is linked in, it is being used as the JPEG2000
reader (even when I have MRSID_FLAGS = -DMRSID_J2K uncommente
