Re: [gdal-dev] Interoperability issues with deleted features in shapefiles

2016-01-20 Thread Even Rouault
Le mercredi 20 janvier 2016 20:56:27, Jan Heckman a écrit : > Hi Even, everyone, > Sorry for not including the list - my mistake. > I've experimented with larger shapefiles than 2 GB but not necessarily in > combination with editing. > I'll do a few tests when I get around to it. Doesn't the .shx f

Re: [gdal-dev] Interoperability issues with deleted features in shapefiles

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Heckman
Hi Even, everyone, Sorry for not including the list - my mistake. I've experimented with larger shapefiles than 2 GB but not necessarily in combination with editing. I'll do a few tests when I get around to it. Doesn't the .shx file get rewritten anyway? There could be some time-consuming actions a

[gdal-dev] Interoperability issues with deleted features in shapefiles

2016-01-19 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, There have been some recent discussion on the qgis list about an old ticket https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11007 Basically the issue seems to be that a lot / most non-shapelib / non-OGR based shapefile readers don't understand the way OGR delete features in shapefiles. When OGR/shapelib delet