Re: [gdal-dev] Hacking the new Landsat pixel_qa help...

2017-05-05 Thread Blumentrath, Stefan
l-dev [gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] im Auftrag von Rutger [kass...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Mai 2017 10:37 An: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Betreff: Re: [gdal-dev] Hacking the new Landsat pixel_qa help... Jonathan Greenberg-4 wrote > Folks: > > USGS, in their infinite wisdom, de

Re: [gdal-dev] Hacking the new Landsat pixel_qa help...

2017-05-05 Thread Matt Perry
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Greenberg-4 wrote > USGS, in their infinite wisdom, decided to embed what is effectively a > 1-bit, 16-band byte-interleaved-by-pixel image into a 16-bit, single-band > geotiff for the Landsat quality mask. I could write some crazy > translation > program that "reverse engin

Re: [gdal-dev] Hacking the new Landsat pixel_qa help...

2017-05-05 Thread Rutger
Jonathan Greenberg-4 wrote > Folks: > > USGS, in their infinite wisdom, decided to embed what is effectively a > 1-bit, 16-band byte-interleaved-by-pixel image into a 16-bit, single-band > geotiff for the Landsat quality mask. I could write some crazy > translation > program that "reverse enginee

[gdal-dev] Hacking the new Landsat pixel_qa help...

2017-05-04 Thread Jonathan Greenberg
Folks: USGS, in their infinite wisdom, decided to embed what is effectively a 1-bit, 16-band byte-interleaved-by-pixel image into a 16-bit, single-band geotiff for the Landsat quality mask. I could write some crazy translation program that "reverse engineers" the data, but I was wondering if ther