Re: [gdal-dev] HFA_USE_RRD vs USE_RRD

2008-08-11 Thread Maciej Sieczka
Frank Warmerdam pisze: If you file a ticket I'll try and document things somewhat better. Done http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2529. Maciek -- Maciej Sieczka www.sieczka.org ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org

Re: [gdal-dev] HFA_USE_RRD vs USE_RRD

2008-08-02 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Maciej Sieczka wrote: Hi! If I use the followiwng syntax: gdaladdo --config HFA_USE_RRD YES --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8 a small aux file and a big rrd file are created. If I use: gdaladdo --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8 only a big aux is created. In the 1st case the sum of aux

Re: [gdal-dev] HFA_USE_RRD vs USE_RRD

2008-08-01 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Maciej Sieczka wrote: Hi! If I use the followiwng syntax: gdaladdo --config HFA_USE_RRD YES --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8 a small aux file and a big rrd file are created. If I use: gdaladdo --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8 only a big aux is created. In the 1st case the sum of aux

[gdal-dev] HFA_USE_RRD vs USE_RRD

2008-08-01 Thread Maciej Sieczka
Hi! If I use the followiwng syntax: gdaladdo --config HFA_USE_RRD YES --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8 a small aux file and a big rrd file are created. If I use: gdaladdo --config USE_RRD YES some.tif 2 4 8 only a big aux is created. In the 1st case the sum of aux and rrd file sizes is