On mardi 27 novembre 2018 14:16:19 CET Björn Harrtell wrote:
> Thanks for the clarifications Even,
>
> I've tried GMLAS but been unsuccessful in getting it to produce useful
> output.
I assume you had a schema to point to.
The GMLAS driver has been tested on a number of fairly complicated models
Thanks for the clarifications Even,
I've tried GMLAS but been unsuccessful in getting it to produce useful
output.
I'm actually quite happy with the standard GML driver, except that it
ignores other attributes when element has xsi:nil. Would it be a welcome
change to remove that behavior, treatin
Hi,
I would mention also an open option EMPTY_AS_NULL=NO that seems to adds some
fields into ogrinfo result:
gml_id: String (0.0) NOT NULL
a1: StringList (0.0)
a2: String (0.0)
a2_uom: String (1.0)
a3_title: String (5.0)
a3: String (0.0)
a3_href: String (22.0)
a4: String (0.0)
a4_href: String (40
> Are my observations correct?
Björn,
It would be difficult to deny the results of tests :-)
The GML driver has a lot of particular handling tailored for particular
datasets, which makes understanding its behaviour non-obvious
From the code (which confirms your observations),
- if an element h
I think I've found some inconsistencies in GML parsing.
Given the following example GML:
http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2";
xmlns:ex="http://example.com";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche
