Hi,
yes that is the mail reporting the error.
Thank you for explanation. I see that I have to reintroduce all the
staff for GDALRasterIO()
Radim
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 19:46:26, Radim Blazek a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>
> Skimming qgis mailing li
Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 19:46:26, Radim Blazek a écrit :
> Hi,
>
Skimming qgis mailing list, I read this http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-
developer/2011-March/013291.html
Was it the report you were refering too ? If yes, then the report gives an
interesting hint. You must be aware that t
Le mercredi 09 mars 2011 19:46:26, Radim Blazek a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> GDALWarpOperation.ChunkAndWarpImage was reported to be extremly slow
> on larger geotiff (over 1GB). Is it possible that it is much slower
> with respect to GDALRasterIO() even without reprojection? Should I
> return to 'manualy'
On 11-03-09 01:46 PM, Radim Blazek wrote:
Hi,
GDALWarpOperation.ChunkAndWarpImage was reported to be extremly slow
on larger geotiff (over 1GB). Is it possible that it is much slower
with respect to GDALRasterIO() even without reprojection? Should I
return to 'manualy' reading data via GDALRast
Hi,
GDALWarpOperation.ChunkAndWarpImage was reported to be extremly slow
on larger geotiff (over 1GB). Is it possible that it is much slower
with respect to GDALRasterIO() even without reprojection? Should I
return to 'manualy' reading data via GDALRasterIO() + fidling with
data extents and cells
