Selon Radim Blazek :
> Hi,
> is it safe to use GDALSetRasterNoDataValue() with
> std::numeric_limits::quiet_NaN()?
There have been some work done in GDAL core (mainly in statistics functions), in
some algorithms (warping for example), in some utilities and in some drivers
(GTiff, VRT) to be able
On 21 August 2012 12:01, Radim Blazek wrote:
> Hi,
> is it safe to use GDALSetRasterNoDataValue() with
> std::numeric_limits::quiet_NaN()?
What kind of safety do you mean?
AFAICT, it does not sound sensible anyway.
Use of NaN would give unreliable results, by definition of NaN:
double n1 =
Hi,
is it safe to use GDALSetRasterNoDataValue() with
std::numeric_limits::quiet_NaN()?
Radim
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
