Markus Neteler via gdal-dev writes:
> Am 29.05.25 um 7:55 PM schrieb Greg Troxel via gdal-dev:
>> The way to debug this is to look at the logs at the computer that
>> receives your mail from lists.osgeo.org, and to see if it is
>> implementing greylisting.
>
> Yes, greylisting is in place on list
Am 29.05.25 um 7:55 PM schrieb Greg Troxel via gdal-dev:
The way to debug this is to look at the logs at the computer that
receives your mail from lists.osgeo.org, and to see if it is
implementing greylisting.
Yes, greylisting is in place on lists.osgeo.org.
Markus
--
Markus Neteler, PhD
http
PS: "New" doesn't mean new, it means "hasn't written in a while", so my own
message got delayed.
This strategy might have worked a long time ago, when spammers would just
connect to the SMTP server of the destination, i.e. mail.osgeo.org. They'd get
an error and their script would move on to an
Barry DeZonia via gdal-dev writes:
> For the record it is not just this user experiencing issues. I
> received the java bindings Original email 11 minutes after the Reply
> to that email.came through. However, I am accessing mail via gmail.com
> too.
Please open a support ticket to have the logs
I experience the same with GDAL and other OSGeo mailing lists. The
delay in receiving a message can be as much as two days, and messages
often arrive out-of-sequence. Other times things happen more or less
instantaneously.
Folks spent some time investigating the issue with the geos-devel list
but
For the record it is not just this user experiencing issues. I
received the java bindings Original email 11 minutes after the Reply
to that email.came through. However, I am accessing mail via gmail.com
too.
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:58 PM Laurențiu Nicola via gdal-dev
wrote:
>
> PS: "New" doesn
Daniel Evans via gdal-dev writes:
> Tom's initial email was delayed by 48 minutes, arriving at 1715 UTC:
> - Originally sent by the mailing list at 1627 UTC
> - After a few internal hops, received by lists.osgeo.org at 1636 UTC (with
> a header stating X-Greylist: delayed by 473 seconds)
> - Rece
Hi,
I think it's at least in part an anti-spam measure. We reject messages from new
users and their server will try later. Spammers are less likely to retry
delivery of their messages.
I'm personally not a fan of this, but..
Laurentiu
On Thu, May 29, 2025, at 20:29, Daniel Evans via gdal-dev
Hi all,
Over the last couple of months, I've been receiving emails from the
gdal-dev list with a significant delay, with emails from threads sometimes
arriving out of order.
For example, in the recent thread on Java bindings, the email headers show
the following;
Tom's initial email was delayed
