d Burken)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:24:56 -0500
> From: Frank Warmerdam
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL contouring problem
> To: Ole Nielsen
> Cc: "gdal-dev@lists.os
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:24:56 -0500
From: Frank Warmerdam
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL contouring problem
To: Ole Nielsen
Cc: "gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org" ,
"adeleb...@me.com"
Message-ID: <4cf32b18.2030...@pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; fo
Is there any reason not to include a heuristic that uses strtod() or
similar to test for the zeroness of the last argument?
-Francis Markham
On 29 November 2010 15:24, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Ole Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> I am posting this again without test files attached due the 50K size
>> limit.
Ole Nielsen wrote:
I am posting this again without test files attached due the 50K size
limit. Anyone who wants to see them, please contact me directly.
--
We have observed interesting anomaly with gdal_contour when one of the
fixed levels is zero.
If the zero contour is expressed as 0.
I am posting this again without test files attached due the 50K size limit.
Anyone who wants to see them, please contact me directly.
--
We have observed interesting anomaly with gdal_contour when one of the fixed
levels is zero.
If the zero contour is expressed as 0.0 (or indeed 0.) gdal_co
