Jon
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
Sent: 17 November 2020 14:11
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
Hi Jon,
No approval/funnel through one person for edits, you can just add your notes
there, so others can follow them so
d, or do people just keep
editing until we're all happy with it?
Thanks,
Jon
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
Sent: 17 November 2020 13:58
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
Hi Jon,
You can press edit and add a sectio
a
> Sent: 16 November 2020 12:54
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
>
> On 2020-11-11 9:00 a.m., Jon Morris wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. The only reason we're trying to build locally
>> is to add File
an be installed to an
environment containing conda-forge GDAL and you now have full FileGDB write
support.
Thanks,
Jon
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
Sent: 16 November 2020 12:54
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
On 2020
package can be
> installed to an environment containing conda-forge GDAL and you now have
> full FileGDB write support.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: gdal-dev On Behalf Of Jeff
> McKenna
> Sent: 16 November 2020 12:54
> To: gdal-dev@list
gdal-dev On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
Sent: 16 November 2020 12:54
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
On 2020-11-11 9:00 a.m., Jon Morris wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your reply. The only reason we're trying to build locally
> is to add FileGDB
On 2020-11-11 9:00 a.m., Jon Morris wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your reply. The only reason we're trying to build locally is
to add FileGDB support - if there is a better way to add FileGDB write
support to conda-forge GDAL, I'd love to hear it! The GDAL docs are very
out of date when it comes
;
> Jon
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Harwood
> *Sent:* 11 November 2020 13:36
> *To:* Jon Morris
> *Cc:* gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
>
>
>
> The documents are horrendously out of date - I know :)
>
> I am assuming that you h
.
Thanks,
Jon
From: Paul Harwood
Sent: 11 November 2020 13:36
To: Jon Morris
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
The documents are horrendously out of date - I know :)
I am assuming that you have seen this and that it does not meet your reqs
https://gdal.org
trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/BuildingOnWindows.
>
>
>
> The only reason I'm building 3.1.4 is because when I started, 3.2.0 wasn't
> out yet...
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Harwood
> *Sent:* 11 November 2020 09:18
>
ev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL conda build
I think we can be fairly certain that gdal-feedstock works, since it has passed
in a clean container environment.
The most obvious question is - I am assuming that you are using conda build -
are you working in a clean conda env?
I think we can be fairly certain that gdal-feedstock works, since it has
passed in a clean container environment.
The most obvious question is - I am assuming that you are using conda build
- are you working in a clean conda env?
Create a totally new conda env, activate that and then try again.
I've been trying to build a Windows conda package for GDAL 3.1.4, but am having
problems with the poppler headers. I'm using the conda-forge recipe, which
includes a line in the build script to detect the poppler version.
FOR /F "tokens=1,2 delims=." %%a IN ("%poppler%") DO (
set POPPLER_MAJOR
13 matches
Mail list logo
