Le dimanche 05 mai 2013 05:01:17, Sam Gillingham a écrit :
> Hi Even, Frank etc,
>
> I have updated the RFC to incorporate the comments from this thread.
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
>
> Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be addressed, or if I
>
Hi Even, Frank etc,
I have updated the RFC to incorporate the comments from this thread.
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be addressed, or if I
have missed anything.
Thanks,
Sam.
On 3 May 2013 20:18, Even Rouault w
Selon Sam Gillingham :
> Hi Even,
>
> Another alternative that will have less impact on existing code and
> behaviour may be to leave GetDefatultRAT and SetDefaultRAT as they are (ie
> returning an in-memory representation of the attribute table -
> GDALRasterAttributeTable). This means existing c
ould initiate a MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT file to list all the
> source incompatibilities with the 1.X versions and how to address them. For
> example, for that RFC, that GDALRasterAttributeTable is no longer
> instanciable, and that GDALDefaultRasterAttributeTable should be used to
> get
changes to the RFC.
>
> Sam and Pete
>
>
> --------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:52:30 +0200
> From: Even Rouault
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Raster Attribute Tables.
> Message-ID: <2013050
nges to the RFC.
Sam and Pete
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:52:30 +0200
From: Even Rouault
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Raster Attribute Tables.
Message-ID: <201305011152.30779.even.roua...@mines-paris.org>
Content-Type: Text
Thanks Ivan,
We explicitly referenced the HFA driver as this is one which is
commonly used and we are familiar with the source code having
submitted a number of patches for the driver.
We plan to provide default implementations of the new functions which
will call the existing Get/Set functions (
Le mercredi 01 mai 2013 01:29:30, Peter Bunting a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> Sam and I have prepared an RFC for our proposal for improving raster
> attribute table (RAT) support and put it on the trac.
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
>
> We'd be keen to here feedback on
bject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Raster Attribute Tables.
> Sent: Apr 30 '13 18:29
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> Sam and I have prepared an RFC for our proposal for improving raster
> attribute table (RAT) support and put it on the trac.
>
>
> [LINK: http://trac.
Hi All,
Sam and I have prepared an RFC for our proposal for improving raster attribute
table (RAT) support and put it on the trac.
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
We'd be keen to here feedback on our proposal.
Best wishes,
Pete
**
Thanks Frank,
Sam and I will prepare a RFC and pass it around. Should we post it to the
mailing list or add directly to the trac?
Best wishes,
Pete
On 24 Apr 2013, at 10:17, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Actually, I should have added that I think a following stage should be for
> yo
Peter,
Actually, I should have added that I think a following stage should be for
you to prepare a formal detailed RFC proposal for voting on by the PSC
rather than just throwing a patch at us since this is an API change.
Best regards,
Frank
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrot
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Peter Bunting wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We were wondering if there is any interest in the GDAL community for
> improving the Raster Attribute Implementation? Within our group of
> collaborators we have been representing image segmentations as clump files
> often large
Hi All,
We were wondering if there is any interest in the GDAL community for improving
the Raster Attribute Implementation? Within our group of collaborators we have
been representing image segmentations as clump files often large attribute
tables containing millions of rows and numerous column
14 matches
Mail list logo
