Ivan Lucena wrote:
We can always have 1.10 and 1.11 etc. That would not be uncommon (there
is for example Perl 5.10 as we're waiting for Perl 6). However, I'm for
I like that.
Folks,
Well, I hate two digit releases, and they confuse the versioning
in stuff like OSGeo4W. Not a compelling r
> ---Original Message---
> From: Ari Jolma
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 2.0 Notes
> Sent: Sep 23 '10 09:04
>
> On 09/22/2010 09:52 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > In IRC I was jus
On 09/22/2010 09:52 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
In IRC I was just mentioning to Howard that we might want to drop use of
CPL_STDCALL in the GDAL API if a 2.0 release ever occurs. It seemed
to me
that such ideas ought to be kept track of so off the "Developer"
section of
the Trac wiki I
>As we are running out of 1.x numbers (1.8.0 hopfully coming out soon),
I'm
>thinking about a 2.0 release for something like the fall of 2012 - just
in
>time for the world to end.
That should simplify keeping track of the EPSG codes...
Doug
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 1
Folks,
In IRC I was just mentioning to Howard that we might want to drop use of
CPL_STDCALL in the GDAL API if a 2.0 release ever occurs. It seemed to me
that such ideas ought to be kept track of so off the "Developer" section of
the Trac wiki I have created a page for this and pre-populated it
