William Kyngesburye wrote:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
ECW tests 14 and 15 check for the wrong driver - they are jp2ecw tests
but check for ecw. (I disabled JP2 in my ECW library build for some
reason I can't remember.)
Hum, you're right. Fixed in trunk in r15864
Hm, do
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I have also re-snapped the autotest suite, and produced a docs
package:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160doc.zip
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdalautotest-1.6.0.zip
Cool, tiff_write_55 now works, osr_esri_10 now works.
-
Willi
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
ECW tests 14 and 15 check for the wrong driver - they are jp2ecw
tests
but check for ecw. (I disabled JP2 in my ECW library build for some
reason I can't remember.)
Hum, you're right. Fixed in trunk in r15864
Hm, doesn't look like it made it
On Dec 1, 2008, at 9:00 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
The gdalhttp test is trying to use the DODS driver.
Yes, this is known : see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2696
There's little we can do to solve that, except maybe change the
syntax
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
The gdalhttp test is trying to use the DODS driver.
Yes, this is known : see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2696
There's little we can do to solve that, except maybe change the
syntax of the
connection string for the GDAL DODS driver, to so
On Dec 1, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I am not in favor of apply the change for 2661 in the 1.6 branch.
I'm not
opposed to it going into trunk now that 1.6 is settling.
Rats. So, 1.6.1?
At least I can apply it to my own binary release, to keep 1.5 and
1.6 plugins separate.
Sorry to keep digging up stuff - this one keeps bugging me (I'm
patching it out of habit now):
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/1242
-
William Kyngesburye
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
"Those people who most want to rule people are, ipso-facto, those
least suited to do it."
- A rule of
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC2 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an RC3. RC3
is available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC3.zip - source as a zip
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6.0RC3.tar.gz - source as
William Kyngesburye wrote:
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
William Kyngesburye wrote:
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into
1.6? Tested on RC1, no problems.
William,
I am not in favor of a
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
I just checked RC2 this against the jp2 problem we have been struggling
with. I believe the patch you made or this is in RC1 and RC2. See below.
...
MrSID: RasterIO() - using optimized dataset level IO.
MrSID: Dataset:IRasterIO(25432,42149 5066x6973 -> 5066x6973 ->
50
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an RC2. RC2
is available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC2.zip - source as a zip
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6
Frank Warmerdam pisze:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected
since RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an
RC2. RC2 is available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC2.zip - source as a zip
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6.
Maciej Sieczka wrote:
Frank Warmerdam pisze:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected
since RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an
RC2. RC2 is available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC2.zip - source as a zip
http://download.o
Default compile fails due to the bug I reported here:
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2628
~Seth
On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an R
On Nov 30, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
William Kyngesburye wrote:
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into
1.6? Tested on RC1, no problems.
William,
I am not in favor of apply the change for 2661 in
Le Sunday 30 November 2008 20:01:02 William Kyngesburye, vous avez écrit :
> A couple notes on the autotests while I wait for RC2 to compile:
>
> Still have problems with the DODS test - it always fails to connect to
> the test host.
The OGR DODS ? It fails for me too : the test must rely on a ser
William Kyngesburye wrote:
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into 1.6?
Tested on RC1, no problems.
William,
I am not in favor of apply the change for 2661 in the 1.6 branch. I'm not
opposed to it going into tru
A couple notes on the autotests while I wait for RC2 to compile:
Still have problems with the DODS test - it always fails to connect to
the test host.
ECW tests 14 and 15 check for the wrong driver - they are jp2ecw tests
but check for ecw. (I disabled JP2 in my ECW library build for some
Ahh, I was just running thru the autotests with RC1.
Any chance of getting http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2661 into
1.6? Tested on RC1, no problems.
On Nov 30, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 wa
Folks,
There have been a few noteworthy errors identified and corrected since
RC1 was issued. So I've decided to retract it and prepare an RC2. RC2
is available at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal160RC2.zip - source as a zip
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6.0RC2.tar.gz - source as
20 matches
Mail list logo
