On vendredi 13 octobre 2017 15:32:11 CEST Matt Hanson wrote:
> Thanks guys, I got it to work from the 2.2 repo branch, which has the
> change on it. I could not get it to work with trunk.
Is pkg-config installed in your Docker env ? Can you share your dockerfile ?
--
Spatialys - Geospatial profe
Thanks guys, I got it to work from the 2.2 repo branch, which has the
change on it. I could not get it to work with trunk.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Sean Gillies wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I've been able to build GDAL with OpenJPEG 2.3.0 by using
> the changeset_40330.diff patch (from the GDAL Tr
Matt,
I've been able to build GDAL with OpenJPEG 2.3.0 by using
the changeset_40330.diff patch (from the GDAL Trac) and no args for
--with-openjpeg:
https://github.com/sgillies/frs-wheel-builds/blob/master/Dockerfile.wheels#L105-L144
These GDAL builds are in the rasterio 1.0a10 wheels on PyPI.
On vendredi 13 octobre 2017 13:47:22 CEST Matt Hanson wrote:
> Hi Even,
>
> Great work with OpenJPEG! I'm trying to get GDAL trunk compiled with
> support for it, but I can't get configuration to find it properly. On an
> Amazon base linux image my simplified Dockerfile is like this:
>
> ```
> R
Hi Even,
Great work with OpenJPEG! I'm trying to get GDAL trunk compiled with
support for it, but I can't get configuration to find it properly. On an
Amazon base linux image my simplified Dockerfile is like this:
```
RUN \
wget https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/archive/v2.3.0.tar.gz; \
Hi,
I've just done changes in GDAL to be able to use the newly released openjpeg
version:
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/7074
For trunk,
- for linux builds, autoconf now uses pkg-config to be able to support more
easily the /usr/
include/openjpeg-2.X path pattern
- for windows build, your
esday, 29 August 2017 7:37 PM
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Cc: jratike80
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
> safer.
> On mardi 29 août 2017 01:42:21 CEST jratike80 wrote:
> > N. Farah wrote
> >
> > > The results you get
I'm curious, why is OpenJpeg not compiled into GDAL by default? Is this a
policy?
Thanks,
Nick
From: gdal-dev [mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Even
Rouault
Sent: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 7:37 PM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: jratike80
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev
On mardi 29 août 2017 01:42:21 CEST jratike80 wrote:
> N. Farah wrote
>
> > The results you get when enabling multi-threading are very interesting:
> > 26.s to 9.9 s. Then using the work in progress you end up with 1s.
> > Basically a 26 times speed improvement.
>
> Hi,
>
> As always when you re
I suppose that the speed-up factor is much less than
26.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Fwd-OpenJPEG-OpenJPEG-2-2-0-is-out-Faster-and-safer-tp5331422p5332873.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at N
Noureddine
From: Even Rouault
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:55 PM
To: N. Farah
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
On lundi 28 août 2017 18:00:03 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Thanks Even for the q
ouault
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:40:31 PM
To: N. Farah
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
Hi,
>
>
> I rebuilt GDAL (older version: 2.1.2) using this new open jpeg 2.2.0
> (https://github.com/ucl
: N. Farah
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 11:42:31 AM
To: Even Rouault; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
Right...since GDAL does not ship the 3rd party lib(s).
Thanks again
From: Even Rou
rom: Even Rouault
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:55 PM
> To: N. Farah
> Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
> safer.
> On lundi 28 août 2017 18:00:03 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> > Thanks Even for the quick r
On lundi 28 août 2017 18:00:03 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Thanks Even for the quick response. I'll give it a try with setting
> OPJ_NUM_THREADS env variable to 8. Does it need to be used with
> GDAL_NUM_THREADS ? Any url to read about those two env variables ?
>
>
I've added some documentation per
h
Hi,
>
>
> I rebuilt GDAL (older version: 2.1.2) using this new open jpeg 2.2.0
> (https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/releases/download/v2.2.0/openjpeg-v2
> .2.0-linux-x86_64.tar.gz)
>
> and tried to convert two jp2 dataset to tiff (gdal_translate):
>
> - bluemarble_4km.jp2: (10800 x 5400 pi
Vincent,
> Well, there might be some small change necessary. Apparently the
> configure script only checks path/include/openjpeg-2.0 and
> path/include/openjpeg-2.1 subdirectories for openjpeg.h, while my
> openjpeg is now in path/include/openjpeg-2.2 :
>
> configure: error: openjpeg.h not found
On 08/14/2017 10:49 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
On dimanche 13 août 2017 15:57:54 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Great news. Thanks for the work.
>
>
> Any plans to integrate this new version in GDAL ?
Well, there's nothing to change in the GDAL source code. The existing
JP2OpenJPEG driver will work
Right...since GDAL does not ship the 3rd party lib(s).
Thanks again
From: Even Rouault
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:49:09 AM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: N. Farah
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and
safer.
On
On dimanche 13 août 2017 15:57:54 CEST N. Farah wrote:
> Great news. Thanks for the work.
>
>
> Any plans to integrate this new version in GDAL ?
Well, there's nothing to change in the GDAL source code. The existing
JP2OpenJPEG driver will work with OpenJPEG 2.2. It is just a matter of
recompi
Great news. Thanks for the work.
Any plans to integrate this new version in GDAL ?
Thanks
Noureddine Farah
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
On 10.08.2017 20:10, Even Rouault wrote:
On jeudi 10 août 2017 20:04:09 CEST Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Even
>
> abidiff tells me:
>
>
> * Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
> openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s).
> Pleas
On jeudi 10 août 2017 20:04:09 CEST Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Even
>
> abidiff tells me:
>
>
> * Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
> openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s).
> Please review them.
>
> changes of 'l
Hi Even
abidiff tells me:
* Incompatible ABI changes between openjpeg2-2.1.2-4.fc26.x86_64.rpm and
openjpeg2-2.2.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm. ABI comparison took 0.45 second(s). Please
review them.
changes of 'libopenjp2.so.2.1.2'===
Functions changes summary: 9 Remove
Great efforts Even!
On 10 August 2017 at 09:17, Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> For those working with JPEG2000, see below
>
>
>
> Even
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
>
>
> Subject: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and safer.
>
> Date: jeudi 10 août 2017, 04:58:13 CE
Hi,
For those working with JPEG2000, see below
Even
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [OpenJPEG] OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is out ! Faster and safer.
Date: jeudi 10 août 2017, 04:58:13 CEST
From: Antonin - OpenJPEG
To: openj...@googlegroups.com
Hi folks,
OpenJPEG 2.2.0 is released tod
Hi Aaron
would this patch (or a patched version of complete Openjpeg source)
already be available for testing to assess the difference to current
release?
Thanks
Armin
On 12/01/16 15:13, Aaron Boxer wrote:
Yes, it will be a lot faster. By the way, this patch may be delayed a
little bit whi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aaron Boxer
Date: Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] OpenJPEG: The Slumbering Giant Awakens
To: Rutger
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Rutger wrote:
> Hey Aaron,
>
> That sounds great, thanks for your efforts. I especially loo
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aaron Boxer
Date: Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] OpenJPEG
To: Julien Malik
Hi Julien,
> Decoding at preccints level in OpenJPEG would definitely be a great
> addition.
>
Yes, sounds useful.
>
> I believe OpenJPEG performa
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Xavier Gorroño
> Date: February 29, 2012 6:25:07 AM EST
> To: OpenJPEG
> Subject: [OpenJPEG] python issues with j2k_to_image and image_to_j2k (version
> 1.5)
> Reply-To: openj...@googlegroups.com
>
> I have been working in an application for a future satellit
30 matches
Mail list logo
