Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-03-06 Thread Sandro Mani
On 06.03.20 07:03, Nyall Dawson wrote: I see you're now the maintainer, and everything is looking MUCH healthier!! Thank you! One question: do you have plans to also update the Fedora 32 GDAL package? That one is still stuck on 2.3 I'm finishing the rawhide rebuilds, once I've resolved all th

Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-03-05 Thread Nyall Dawson
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 20:32, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > Let me know if I can do anything to help (even if you just want me to > > pester on the bug reports to try to raise the severity of the issues > > around these older package versions!) > > I've moved ahead and filed [1] to formally resolve the

Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-02-24 Thread Sandro Mani
Let me know if I can do anything to help (even if you just want me to pester on the bug reports to try to raise the severity of the issues around these older package versions!) I've moved ahead and filed [1] to formally resolve the situation. Feel free to add comments there. Sandro [1] https

Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-02-23 Thread Nyall Dawson
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 23:25, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi Nyall > > I've started the non-responsive maintainer process for various gis packages > last week since they are indeed pretty neglected an am testing the updates > here [1]. I'm hoping to finish the process next week and get things > up-t

Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-02-23 Thread Markus Neteler
Hi Sandro, Nyall, all, On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 2:25 PM Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi Nyall > > I've started the non-responsive maintainer process for various gis packages > last week since they are indeed pretty neglected an am testing the updates > here [1]. I'm hoping to finish the process next w

Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-02-23 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Nyall I've started the non-responsive maintainer process for various gis packages last week since they are indeed pretty neglected an am testing the updates here [1]. I'm hoping to finish the process next week and get things up-to-date again. Sandro [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/

Re: [gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-02-22 Thread mick howe
Don't know if this would still work but back about Fedora 1 - 3 I used checkinstall to build & package .tar.gz's into rpms then used a version of apt for redhat to manage them as a local repository. I was a lot more clever back then and have been using arch since 2008-9 mick in glen innes On Sun,

[gdal-dev] Fedora package status

2020-02-22 Thread Nyall Dawson
Hi list, Does anyone with any knowledge of the fedora packaging infrastructure have any advice for getting the gdal library updated in the fedora repos? Even on the most recent Fedora releases, this is stuck at absolutely ancient versions (2.3!). Worse is that the proj library has been updated,