Re: [gdal-dev] EPSG 7.9 Upgrade in Trunk

2011-09-29 Thread Stephen Woodbridge
On 9/29/2011 3:03 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: Folks, I have upgraded libgeotiff, PROJ.4 and GDAL with EPSG definitions regenerated from the EPSG 7.9 database. New "preferred datum shift selection" rules are also in place which will give preference to 7 parameter datum shifts over 3 parameter datu

Re: [gdal-dev] EPSG 7.9 Upgrade in Trunk

2011-09-29 Thread Ari Jolma
On 09/29/2011 10:54 AM, Even Rouault wrote: Selon Frank Warmerdam: Frank, There might be further actions needed as far as GDAL (and libgeotiff perhaps ?) is concerned according to ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4223 : "Next time the EPSG database is updated, note that a Krovak paramet

Re: [gdal-dev] EPSG 7.9 Upgrade in Trunk

2011-09-29 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Frank Warmerdam : Frank, There might be further actions needed as far as GDAL (and libgeotiff perhaps ?) is concerned according to ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4223 : "Next time the EPSG database is updated, note that a Krovak parameter has been renamed (and renumbered)." Best

[gdal-dev] EPSG 7.9 Upgrade in Trunk

2011-09-29 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Folks, I have upgraded libgeotiff, PROJ.4 and GDAL with EPSG definitions regenerated from the EPSG 7.9 database. New "preferred datum shift selection" rules are also in place which will give preference to 7 parameter datum shifts over 3 parameter datum shifts are also in place causing a fair amo