Re: [OT] Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-24 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Klokan Petr Přidal wrote: Hi Mateusz, I am sorry, it seems there is no way how to link the abstract directly on the web. So you should go to: http://2009.foss4g.org/presentations/ And click "Vote for abstracts" and then find my presentation. It has a label "GDAL" ;-). Maybe once you log in to

Re: [OT] Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-23 Thread Klokan Petr Přidal
Hi Mateusz, I am sorry, it seems there is no way how to link the abstract directly on the web. So you should go to: http://2009.foss4g.org/presentations/ And click "Vote for abstracts" and then find my presentation. It has a label "GDAL" ;-). Maybe once you log in to their system, then my link m

[OT] Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-23 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Klokan Petr Přidal wrote: > I would like to present the MapTiler at FOSS4G in Sydney in case I get > a time slot... > BTW You can vote for my presentation at: > http://dev.extranet.lisasoft.com/foss4g/itemrate/list/all/gdal/ Trying to load this page, I'm getting "Page not found (404)". If fixed, I

Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-23 Thread Klokan Petr Přidal
tor.shtml BTW, they are a > completely *nix house (Solaris, Mac OS-X, FreeBSD and Linux). > > here is an abstract (by the author B. Castalia) > http://www.lsstmail.org/meet_coll/ongoing/Software/ > > Regards, > Trent > > > From: Fabrice LALLAURET - PSV > T

Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-17 Thread Trent M Hare
AURET - PSV To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Date: 06/16/2009 08:32 AM Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing Sent by: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org John Donovan a écrit : > Hi, > We currently have a stand-alone app that converts, mosaicks and scales > GDAL-supported images to a prop

Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-16 Thread Fabrice LALLAURET - PSV
John Donovan a écrit : Hi, We currently have a stand-alone app that converts, mosaicks and scales GDAL-supported images to a proprietary format. It works well, but we handle tens of thousands of source files at a time, which can slow the process down to a crawl. So we're investigating parallelis

Re: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-13 Thread Seth Price
I would personally use Condor to distribute the processes, but the learning curve may be steep depending on where you're coming from. ~Seth On Jun 12, 2009, at 5:05 AM, John Donovan wrote: Hi, We currently have a stand-alone app that converts, mosaicks and scales GDAL-supported images to a pr

RE: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-12 Thread Matthew Snape
Message- From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of John Donovan Sent: 12 June 2009 12:06 To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [gdal-dev] Distributed processing Hi, We currently have a stand-alone app that converts, mosaicks and scales GDAL

[gdal-dev] Distributed processing

2009-06-12 Thread John Donovan
Hi, We currently have a stand-alone app that converts, mosaicks and scales GDAL-supported images to a proprietary format. It works well, but we handle tens of thousands of source files at a time, which can slow the process down to a crawl. So we're investigating parallelising this process over sev