Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2018-12-17 Thread Even Rouault
> I have run some initial tests on an untiled/uncompressed image basically > skipping step 1 and going straight to adding overviews and translating to > reorder, compress, and tile. The resulting image passes the COG validator > test, meaning it is a "valid" COG, though the overview offset values a

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2018-12-17 Thread anash
Hi Even, I have seen pretty much everywhere that COG's are created in 3 steps: 1. compress and tile the image $ gdal_translate -co TILED=YES -co COMPRESS=DEFLATE in.tif tmp.tif 2. add overviews $ gdaladdo -r average 2 4 8 16 tmp.tif 3. reorder overviews $ gdal_translate -co TILED=YES -co COM

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2018-02-14 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Added the delete and validate works now. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > On mercredi 14 février 2018 11:00:01 CET Kurt Schwehr wrote: > > > (working from pretty close to head...) > > > > > > A follow up question on how to create cogeo files... > > > > > > I appea

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2018-02-14 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 14 février 2018 11:00:01 CET Kurt Schwehr wrote: > (working from pretty close to head...) > > A follow up question on how to create cogeo files... > > I appear to need to do additional work to set BLOCK_OFFSET_?_?. How do I > go about this? > > I'm trying to create a cogeo without g

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2018-02-14 Thread Kurt Schwehr
(working from pretty close to head...) A follow up question on how to create cogeo files... I appear to need to do additional work to set BLOCK_OFFSET_?_?. How do I go about this? I'm trying to create a cogeo without gdal_translate in java by using create and createcopy like this: https://gist

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2017-12-10 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Thanks Even for the feedback. There have be a few offline discussions going on and Even added some notes to the document on Trac: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/CloudOptimizedGeoTIFF?action=diff&version=11

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2017-11-15 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 14 novembre 2017 14:20:58 CET Kurt Schwehr wrote: > Hi Even, > > I have some follow up questions on Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs: The main constraint of C.O.G is that all the IFD definitions are at the beginning of the file, to avoid seeking at various points in it. Other parameters are pr

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2017-11-14 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Hi Even, I have some follow up questions on Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs: * Is there a preferred/better INTERLEAVE if there is more than one band? * Is there a preferred tile blocksize? You have 512 in your examples. Are there any major trade offs between using 128, 256, 512, or 1024 for x and y bl

Re: [gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2017-05-10 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 10 mai 2017 14:41:44 CEST Peter Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into something confusing when using gdal-2.2.0 to generate Cloud > Optimized GeoTIFFs following the instructions at: > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/CloudOptimizedGeoTIFF > > Here's what I did: > > 1. Fetch an image: >

[gdal-dev] Creating Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs

2017-05-10 Thread Peter Schmitt
Hi, I ran into something confusing when using gdal-2.2.0 to generate Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs following the instructions at: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/CloudOptimizedGeoTIFF Here's what I did: 1. Fetch an image: env CPL_VSIL_CURL_ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS=tif GDAL_DISABLE_READDIR_ON_OPEN=YES VSI_