While not exciting, definitely important. I didn't see anything to comment
on in the RFC.
Thanks for working on this!
-Kurt
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 7:57 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> nothing exciting, just robustness/enhanced security.
>
> RFC 105 tex
Hi,
nothing exciting, just robustness/enhanced security.
RFC 105 text: Add and use safe path manipulation functions:
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11640
Summary:
This RFC adds safe versions, for use by C++ code, of all functions of
cpl_path.cpp (such as CPLGetPath(), CPLGetDirname(), C
