Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write capabilities

2016-10-03 Thread Even Rouault
Le lundi 03 octobre 2016 17:49:34, Howard Butler a écrit : > Even, > > I briefly looked at it the other day. My only nit was it seems a little > confusing to have a GetNextFeature on both the Dataset and the Layer. Is > one always better than the other? Which one should I use when? Should I > alwa

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write capabilities

2016-10-03 Thread Howard Butler
Even, I briefly looked at it the other day. My only nit was it seems a little confusing to have a GetNextFeature on both the Dataset and the Layer. Is one always better than the other? Which one should I use when? Should I always use Dataset::GetNextFeature() and let it forward down to OGRLaye

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write capabilities

2016-10-03 Thread Even Rouault
If nobody has remarks on it, I'll call for a vote on this on Wednesday. Even > Hi, > > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write > capabilities" : > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc66_randomlayerreadwrite > > This RFC introduces a new API to be able to iterate

[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write capabilities

2016-09-28 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, This is a call for discussion on "RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write capabilities" : https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc66_randomlayerreadwrite This RFC introduces a new API to be able to iterate over vector features at dataset level, in addition to the existing capability of doing it at