Jan 2024 13:14:09 +0100
From: Javier Jimenez Shaw mailto:j...@jimenezshaw.com>>
To: gdal dev mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: [gdal-dev] COG via HTTP POST
Message-ID:
mailto:a...@mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi
Does it make any sens
Thanks Even.
I will tell them about the missing SRS
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024, 13:39 Even Rouault, wrote:
> Javier,
>
> According to https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7233.html#header.range , HTTP
> Range requests only apply to GET requests. So COGs delivered through POST
> can indeed only be usable after
Javier,
According to https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7233.html#header.range , HTTP
Range requests only apply to GET requests. So COGs delivered through
POST can indeed only be usable after full download.
BTW, someone should ask CNIG to include GeoTIFF SRS tags. At least, for
file
pnt_sentinel2
Hi
Does it make any sense to provide COG via HTTP POST method?
If I understand correctly, the "magic" of downloading only what is needed
from the server is done with HTTP Range requests. But I am not sure if that
works in POST method (it does work in GET method, when enabled ;).
In case it could w
