I didn't see any objections, so I'm going to go ahead and start removing
the option and the #if cpp stuff.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Dmitry Baryshnikov
wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> I think, that it's time to do this.
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>
> 17.03.2016 19:19, Kurt Schwehr пишет:
>
> I
On Thursday 17 March 2016 09:19:32 Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> I propose that we remove --without-ogr and OGR_ENABLED.
+1
> Happy to hear
> arguments for the contrary. I commented here:
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6117
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Even Rouault
>
> wrote:
> > K
I propose that we remove --without-ogr and OGR_ENABLED. Happy to hear
arguments for the contrary. I commented here:
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6117
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Kor,
>
> I'm half surprised this ended up being broken. At the time of
> https://t
Hi Kurt,
I think, that it's time to do this.
Best regards,
Dmitry
17.03.2016 19:19, Kurt Schwehr пишет:
I propose that we remove --without-ogr and OGR_ENABLED. Happy to hear
arguments for the contrary. I commented here:
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6117
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9
Kor,
I'm half surprised this ended up being broken. At the time of
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification, it still worked
apparently but I might have accidentaly broken it later.
Anyway I was wondering if it was worth fixing that? as it might be a continuing
maintenance
Dear all,
I may have found an issue in the build scripts of gdal 2.0.0. Building
gdal without ogr on Linux fails on my machine:
./configure --without-ogr
make -j8
I attached the output of configure and copied the snippets from the
build output detailing the errors below.
When I change --wi
