On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Oliver Burger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know, you are only talking about a beta1 right now, but as package
> maintainer at Mageia, I would be interested to know if there will be any
> bigger api changes, making it difficult to build apps linking against libgdal.
Oliver,
Hi,
I know, you are only talking about a beta1 right now, but as package
maintainer at Mageia, I would be interested to know if there will be any
bigger api changes, making it difficult to build apps linking against libgdal.
By the way, do you have any roadmap for gdal-1.9?
Thanks,
Oliver
___
f that license are
>> very similar to X11/MIT.
>>
>>
>> David E. DeHaan
>> SQL Anywhere Query Processing team
>> Sybase, an SAP Company
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Frank Warmerdam
>>
>> To: gdal-dev
>>
>> D
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Lauri Kajan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would be more than happy if there was xyzm support in OGR. But I
> thought this won't happen until we decide to implement OGC Simple
> Feature Access 1.2 specification.
> Now ogr implements Simple Feature 1.1 that does not suppor
SQL Anywhere Query Processing team
> Sybase, an SAP Company
>
>
>
> From: Frank Warmerdam
>
> To: gdal-dev
>
> Date: 12/14/2011 02:32 AM
>
> Subject: [gdal-dev] 1.9 Release Process
>
> Sent by:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> F
1 02:32 AM
Subject: [gdal-dev] 1.9 Relea
Hi all,
I would be more than happy if there was xyzm support in OGR. But I
thought this won't happen until we decide to implement OGC Simple
Feature Access 1.2 specification.
Now ogr implements Simple Feature 1.1 that does not support M-values
or even Z-coordinates.
It would be nice to see this i
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011, 21.04:13 schrieb Even Rouault:
> Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011 15:48:30, Pirmin Kalberer a écrit :
> > Hi Frank, all
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, um 08.31:22 schrieb Frank Warmerdam:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I would like to have a GDAL/OGR 1.9 release by t
Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011 15:48:30, Pirmin Kalberer a écrit :
> Hi Frank, all
>
> Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, um 08.31:22 schrieb Frank Warmerdam:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I would like to have a GDAL/OGR 1.9 release by the end of this year,
> > ideally before Christmas. We have not formalized a
Pirmin,
I have made a note to myself to look into this ticket tonight.
Best regards,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
> Hi Frank, all
>
> Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, um 08.31:22 schrieb Frank Warmerdam:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would like to have a GDAL/OGR 1.9 release by th
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Etienne Tourigny
wrote:
> Frank, I have 2 issues I would like to address before 1.9 is released.
>
> 1) The ability to save the gdal commandline string and access it later.
>
> This is useful for the netcdf 'history' metadata, and consistent with
> all other softwa
Hi Frank, all
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, um 08.31:22 schrieb Frank Warmerdam:
> Folks,
>
> I would like to have a GDAL/OGR 1.9 release by the end of this year,
> ideally before Christmas. We have not formalized a release process
> for the project, but I'd like to follow the approach of past
ber 14, 2011 9:31 AM
To: gdal-dev
Subject: [gdal-dev] 1.9 Release Process
Folks,
I would like to have a GDAL/OGR 1.9 release by the end of this year,
ideally before Christmas. We have not formalized a release process
for the project, but I'd like to follow the approach of past y
Frank, I have 2 issues I would like to address before 1.9 is released.
1) The ability to save the gdal commandline string and access it later.
This is useful for the netcdf 'history' metadata, and consistent with
all other software that manipulates netcdf files. Suggested patch
adds 2 functions
Folks,
I would like to have a GDAL/OGR 1.9 release by the end of this year,
ideally before Christmas. We have not formalized a release process
for the project, but I'd like to follow the approach of past years.
This basically consists of a few beta releases, followed by a release
candidate when
15 matches
Mail list logo
