nice, thanks so much for the extended description.
Cheers, Mike
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023, 21:34 Even Rouault, wrote:
> Michael,
>
> It turns out that gdal_translate was using 255.999 since the origins in
> 2002 :
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/47d859efb25da249b5d62eb8619c36134ae76572#diff-d5
Michael,
It turns out that gdal_translate was using 255.999 since the origins in
2002 :
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/47d859efb25da249b5d62eb8619c36134ae76572#diff-d57b4553312c88a736821448adc155e6797653b0d902bd42f9310572aa71f0b0R215
I suspect the reasoning was that, if you rounded valu
Hi, I'm expecting `gdal_translate -scale` to emit values in the range 0,255
but it seems to be targeting 0,256. (All works as expected when using
explicit src_min src_max dst_min dst_max).
To see the output range on a simple example (see code at link below in case
email garbles):
from osgeo impo