Thanks! we will check that out
On 8/16/13 3:17 PM, "Even Rouault" wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 août 2013 21:08:44, jim hopper a écrit :
>> Sorry I just passing this on for a coworker,
>> Gdal 1.9.2 and SWIG is 2.0.10
>
> I've just tested with SWIG 2.0.10 (and G
Sorry I just passing this on for a coworker,
Gdal 1.9.2 and SWIG is 2.0.10
Thanks jim
On 8/16/13 2:58 PM, "Even Rouault" wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 août 2013 20:33:57, jim hopper a écrit :
>> Is there any limitations on which version of swig can be used with gdal.
>> We
Is there any limitations on which version of swig can be used with gdal. We
are running into problems where our java code can¹t find the gdal plugins.
15:35:27,055 WARNING [it.geosolutions.imageio.gdalframework]
(http--0.0.0.0-8442-3) Failed to get the specified GDAL Driver: DTED
Cause: java.lang
On 10/1/10 12:00 PM, "gdal-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org"
wrote:
> Send gdal-dev mailing list submissions to
> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject o
Ok, I got gdal rebuilt with xercesc support, and I can read it with ogrinfo.
But it says:
Had to open data source read-only.
INFO: Open of `test.gml'
using driver `GML' successful.
Layer name: ford_plant_2d_bldgs
Geometry: Unknown (any)
But the original shape file does have geometry:
INFO
I will rebuild. Thanks!
Jim
On 6/1/10 4:07 PM, "Frank Warmerdam" wrote:
> jim hopper wrote:
>> I used the following to do the conversion:
>>
>> ogr2ogr -f GML test.gml test.shp
>>
>> I got a file test.gml and test.xsd which appear to have the po
I used the following to do the conversion:
ogr2ogr -f GML test.gml test.shp
I got a file test.gml and test.xsd which appear to have the polygons and
geometry in them. When I try to look at it with ogrinfo I get
ERROR 1: Unable to create Xerces C++ based GML reader, Xerces support
not configured
ial
> applications.
>
> So I am still dubious about using it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:12 AM, jim hopper wrote:
>> I read the item about lack of support for the J2K_SUBFILE mechanism using
>> jasper, and that it requires one of the commercial
I read the item about lack of support for the J2K_SUBFILE mechanism using
jasper, and that it requires one of the commercial jpeg2000 drivers. Is
that still the case, or Is there a way to read jpeg2k nitfs with open source
jpeg2k libraries?
Best jim
__
Is there going to be an autotest download available for new 1.6.2 version?
Thanks jim
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
might want to fix them. No problem if it has to wait.
Best jim
On 8/6/09 5:36 PM, "Frank Warmerdam" wrote:
> jim hopper wrote:
>> Any chance of fixing the makefile issues I reported with cxxflags and
>> cppflags? Before final?
>
> Jim,
>
> They didn'
Fred,
Any chance of fixing the makefile issues I reported with cxxflags and
cppflags? Before final?
Best jim
On 8/6/09 4:29 PM, "gdal-dev-requ...@lists.osgeo.org"
wrote:
> Motion: Adopt GDAL 1.6.2RC2 as final release (Frank Warmerdam)
___
gdal-de
I was trying to build gdal and noticed that setting CFLAGS is not enough as
you also need CPPFLAGS for the c++ code, fair enough. But some places (the
one I found is in gcore and frmts/ilwis) this is not handled correctly. In
gcore this appears correct
CPPFLAGS:=$(GDAL_INCLUDE) $(CPPFLA
13 matches
Mail list logo
