Even & Klokan,
1/ Thanks for your comments and link. The light has dawned, and I've now
understood the differences in tile naming between
TMS and XYZ tilsets.
I edited the overlays.html created by gdal2tiles.py to use both
OpenLayers.Layer.TMS and OpenLayers.Layer.XYZ.
Rather than create a 'proper
Hi,
I'm having big problems understanding what's happening with tiles created
by gdal2tiles.py --version GDAL 1.8.1, released 2011/07/09
Running on Slackware 13.37 64 bit.
The results of tiling a colour relief look OK:
http://pgg999.freehostingcloud.com/tiles4_srtm/openlayers.html
http://pgg999.fr
Just a comment - I recently tried using the latest ASTER data and was pretty
disappointed with my results in making
colour relief map underlays. Lots of anomalies and artifacts.
If you google "aster mole runs anomalies artifacts pits" you'll find some
discussion.
Cheers,
Peter
--
View this messag
Answered my own question - duplicated the result on a different OS.
Installed Ubuntu's packaged gdal-1.5.1 + proj-4.6.0 + geos-3.0.0 + ogdi-3.2.0
on a Virtual Machine running Ubuntu 8.10 - the Intrepid Ibex.
Exactly the same result:
@VMUBUNTU:~$ gdaltransform -s_srs EPSG:28992 -t_srs EPSG:31370
//postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-commits/2008-May/000283.html
That would likely explain the shift - the documentation probably hasn't been
updated.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, geep999 wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have own-compiled gdal-1.6.0 on Linux - Slackware 12.2.
Hi,
I have own-compiled gdal-1.6.0 on Linux - Slackware 12.2.
The documentation for gdalwarp - http://www.gdal.org/gdaltransform.html - shows
an example and a result:
Simple reprojection from one projected coordinate system to another:
gdaltransform -s_srs EPSG:28992 -t_srs EPSG:31370
177502 3118
