Dear list
I had earlier built gdal 2.1.0 Beta, and now I am trying to experiment with
libpng in version 2.0.2 source.(Using ./configure, make, and then sudo make
install).
But everytime I use make, somehow the changes are not taken into effect.
gdalinfo --version results in gdal 2.1.0(Beta), even
t for nbits < 8".
Could you please advise me how to proceed now?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:07 AM, Tanuj Kumar wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> Thank you for your feedback. I will look into all the files in libpng once
> again.
>
> About the python support - I think I found
let me know.
Thank you,
Tanuj Kumar
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
e only
> building is not enough to have python bindings work (there is a tick with
> PYTHONPATH, but not sure that it works.
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>
> 20.03.2016 10:15, Tanuj Kumar пишет:
>
> Hello Dmitry,
> Sorry for the long delay, my exams had the better o
; On Linux Linux this is done via such command:
> ./configure --with-python ...
>
> On Windows it depends how you build. On Windows I launch separate tests
> successfully but never try the whole tests (run_all.py).
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>
> 14.03.2016 19:11, Ta
u or anyone please guide me on how to proceed with this?
Thanks
Tanuj
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Tanuj Kumar wrote:
> Alright, thank you very much, I'll get to work on it!
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshnikov > wrote:
>
>> Hi Tanuj,
>>
&
Alright, thank you very much, I'll get to work on it!
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Dmitry Baryshnikov
wrote:
> Hi Tanuj,
>
> I wrote a big letter to the list. There is some answers there. Also I add
> comments below.
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>
> 12.
nuj,
> 09.03.2016 13:17, Tanuj Kumar пишет:
>
> Yes, I have looked at the ideas list, and I am currently reading up on
> idea no. 16, which is, implementing support for the proposed standard for
> incrementally parseable GeoJSON data.
>
> Also, I was thinking that maybe I could work on
ut, have you some preferable idea (or ideas) for GSoC from this list or
> maybe you have got own?
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>
> 04.03.2016 16:11, Tanuj Kumar пишет:
>
> Hello,
> I am interested in applying for GSoC this year. Currently, I am reading up
> on the GDA
nity version, the others are prof
> versions, but that should not make aucune difference, of course.
> Jan
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Tanuj Kumar wrote:
>
>> This is with regard to the bug listed on
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6388
>>
>> Th
sible!
Thank you,
Tanuj Kumar
Birla institute of Technology and Science
Pilani, Rajasthan,
India
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
This is with regard to the bug listed on
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6388
The fix is to remove the hard coded pi constants, but apparently, using
M_PI from math.h as it is breaks compilation on Visual Studio
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26065359/m-pi-flagged-as-undeclared-identifier
(
Hello,
I would like to work on the defect listed under #6388 ( Get rid of the
remaining hard coded pi constants)
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6388
Also, if we're to remove the hard coded pi constants, shouldn't we also
remove the ln2 constants, as that too is defined under math.h?
Thank yo
Hello, I'm Tanuj. I'd like to contribute to open source. I have absolutely
no prior experience to working for open source, and I'd like to start with
an easy bug. I know C++. Could someone please guide me on this?
Thank you
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal
14 matches
Mail list logo
