Re: [gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override line into gcs.override.csv

2015-01-08 Thread Schmid Andreas
t, Andy Von: fwarmer...@gmail.com [mailto:fwarmer...@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Frank Warmerdam Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2015 18:52 An: Schmid Andreas Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Betreff: Re: [gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override line into gcs.override.csv Schmid, If you file a

Re: [gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override line into gcs.override.csv

2015-01-07 Thread Schmid Andreas
oua...@spatialys.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Januar 2015 15:08 An: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Cc: Schmid Andreas Betreff: Re: [gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override line into gcs.override.csv Andreas, Datum shifts are always tricky. I've dug up that issue a bit. The GDAL EPSG

Re: [gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override line into gcs.override.csv

2015-01-06 Thread Schmid Andreas
Help? Anyone? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag von Schmid Andreas Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2014 17:29 An: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Betreff: [gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override

[gdal-dev] Request for reintroduction of an override line into gcs.override.csv

2014-12-17 Thread Schmid Andreas
Hi I hope this is the right mailing list to ask the following: I've realized that in GDAL 1.9.2 the "towgs84" parameters of the Swiss "CH1903" GCS (EPSG:4149) appear incorrectly. According to [1], they should be 674.374,15.056,405.346 instead of 674.4,15.1,405.3 It seems that the origin