Re: [gdal-dev] Report on GEOS maintenance grant

2023-04-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 09:32:58AM -0500, Daniel Baston wrote: > > For anyone who’s interested, I wanted to share a few of the highlights from > my perspective. Great work Daniel, thanks to you and to the GDAL PSC for the opportunity ! --strk; Libre GIS consultant/developer https://strk.kb

Re: [gdal-dev] [geos-devel] GEOS Maintenance Grant

2022-02-16 Thread Sandro Santilli
+1 from a GEOS PSC member --strk; On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:37:37AM -0600, Howard Butler wrote: > GDAL PSC, > > When we wrote the GDAL RFCs on sponsorship, we provided an escape clause to > allow us to direct resources to other projects upon which GDAL depends. Our > sponsorship numbers are st

Re: [gdal-dev] Official IRC channel

2021-09-08 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 02:52:02PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > I've just updated the doc to point to https://web.libera.chat/#gdal > > There was a previous mention of a bridging between a GDAL Matrix room and > freenode #gdal, but I'm not sure if that was ported to libera.chat so I've >

Re: [gdal-dev] Freenode IRC taken over(was Fwd: [SAC] [Hosting] OSUOSL IRC channels moving to irc.libera.chat)

2021-05-21 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 08:07:12PM +0200, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > But... the cool thing is you don't need to register at matrix.org to be able > to use other matrix servers. > > As Sandro says: your osgeo.org-id should also be a valid (osgeo)-matrix id, > at least to communicate with osgeo

Re: [gdal-dev] Freenode IRC taken over(was Fwd: [SAC] [Hosting] OSUOSL IRC channels moving to irc.libera.chat)

2021-05-20 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:00:52PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > See below about Freenode IRC having been taken over (or considered as such > by most Freenode admins), which affects our existing #gdal channel. > > What should we do: > > - give up with IRC at all, and just use the Slack ch

Re: [gdal-dev] git(hub) migration

2017-09-25 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:56:02AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote: > Sandro already did a proof of concept with GEOS though he didn't officially > move the tickets off of trac. This was the result of last "import" from trac, if you're curious: https://git.osgeo.org/gogs/strk/geos-migration-test/issues (

Re: [gdal-dev] git(hub) migration ?

2017-09-25 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 03:55:43PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 02:10:46PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > > As far as I can see, only GEOS has > > migrated to https://git.osgeo.org/gogs > > Librttopo has its official home there too: > https://g

Re: [gdal-dev] git(hub) migration ?

2017-09-25 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 02:10:46PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > It is still Gogs. > > The plan is to switch to Gitea (http://gitea.io) > > There's some irony that gitea.io points to github.com for their own code. Not > particularly > reassuring re

Re: [gdal-dev] git(hub) migration ?

2017-09-25 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:14:26PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > 1) migrate to git, and remain within the OSGeo infrastructure. This is for > example the case of > GEOS which uses the Trac git plugin and the GOGS (or is gitea?) git hosting > (https:// > git.osgeo.org/gogs/geos/geos.git). It is

Re: [gdal-dev] [SAC] Creation of pages on Trac wiki disabled

2016-05-11 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Wiki page creation disabled again because of another spam storm I don't > manage > to block. > > If you look at https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/timeline , I've left 2 example of > spam pages. Both contain the 'pogo' word that I've expl

Re: [gdal-dev] Pg Table Listing

2015-03-23 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:25:30PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote: > Le mercredi 18 mars 2015 18:59:28, Paul Ramsey a écrit : > > With 1000 tables, the disparity is 300ms for the join on geometry_columns > > and 30ms for the straight system table query. > > On my system, just "select * from geometry_co

Re: [gdal-dev] Pg Table Listing

2015-03-18 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:58:20AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > There’s also a couple new relation types, ‘m’ for materialized > views and ‘f’ for… gah! I don’t know. I think 'f' is for foreign data tables. It's surprising that joining a view on catalogue tables considerably slows down. Shouldn'

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 49: Curve geometries

2014-11-11 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:29:22PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote: > Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 20:20:25, Robert Coup a écrit : > > I presume that the concept is to add curve-specific geometry functions > > (rather than their linear equivalents) over time, as eg. > > GEOS/PostGIS/whatever support them?

Re: [gdal-dev] Identity affine handling in GDALCreateGenImgProjTransformer2

2014-09-02 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:56:40PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Selon Sandro Santilli : > > I did make a fresh rebuild in gdal/ dir. > > And still crashing ? Where does it crash ? TEST: vrt_read_5 ... Segmentation fault (core dumped) Core was generated by `python run_a

Re: [gdal-dev] Identity affine handling in GDALCreateGenImgProjTransformer2

2014-09-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:00:24PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > Selon Sandro Santilli : > > Uhm, locally I get a segfault when running the testsuite, with > > trunk untouched (autotest$ python run_all.py) > > They should run. If you svn updated a previous working copy, try

Re: [gdal-dev] Identity affine handling in GDALCreateGenImgProjTransformer2

2014-09-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:45:23PM +0200, Even Rouault wrote: > > Basically it looks like the code doesn't not trust the return code > > from the driver's GDALGetGeoTransform() call, but rather look at the > > returned matrix to decide if the raster did have or not a an affine > > transformation.

[gdal-dev] Identity affine handling in GDALCreateGenImgProjTransformer2

2014-09-01 Thread Sandro Santilli
Hi all, I'm trying to cleanup the PostGIS raster code handling raster warping and got suprised by the complex code used there to do what looks like being a workaround for a GDAL bug. The workaround adds some permutations to rasters with an affine transform of {0,1,0,0,0,-1}. Looking at the GDAL co

Re: [gdal-dev] PostGIS SRID conundrum

2012-02-14 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Martin Chapman wrote: > 4. I select the max(srid) where srid > 1000. If zero is > returned then I use that base number (1000) and add a new entry to the > spatial_ref_sys table using the proj4 text and wkt so all fields have a > value…and my app na