On 04/30/2014 05:32 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 17:19:04, Mario Jurcevic a écrit :
On 04/30/2014 05:11 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Not that much a big difference... Perhaps you should try to isolate which
layer conversion if particuarly slower with ogr2ogr
I get big
On 04/30/2014 05:11 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Not that much a big difference... Perhaps you should try to isolate which layer
conversion if particuarly slower with ogr2ogr
I get big difference:
time ogr2ogr -sql 'select
"soft_gis_serial","Origine","Qualita","Genere",st_curvetoline("Geometria"
On 04/28/2014 08:02 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le lundi 28 avril 2014 16:47:49, Mario Jurcevic a écrit :
Hi,
I try to export postgis tables ( 200 ) to shape; It seems ogr2ogr is
much more slow than "pgsql2shp" from postgis.
ogr2ogr: about 15 minutes
pgsql2shp: about 2 minutes
Any kn
Hi,
I try to export postgis tables ( 200 ) to shape; It seems ogr2ogr is
much more slow than "pgsql2shp" from postgis.
ogr2ogr: about 15 minutes
pgsql2shp: about 2 minutes
Any known reason for that?
Thanks for any suggestion.
--
Mari
Hi,
with gdal 1.9.2 when passing to ogr2ogr the layer names to import (
interlis 1 driver ) some layers could not be found.
Instead when importing the whole file everything is OK.
The ili file contains 109 layers.
Is there some limitations on the arguments length?
Thanks.
Regards,
Mario
