can do to help with this.
Thanks!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Le vendredi 04 septembre 2015 12:43:21, Gawade P a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can we consider updating the config.guess and config.sub files in the
>> source to the latest available ver
Hi,
Can we consider updating the config.guess and config.sub files in the
source to the latest available version?
The current one does not have support for newer platforms like ppc64le.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks!
___
gdal-dev mailing l
Hi Even,
I have raised the ticket: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6091
and attached the patch to it.
Thanks.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Gawade P wrote:
> Thanks, Even. Sure, I will run the full test suite, prepare the patch,
> raise a ticket and update it.
>
> On Fri, Aug
t; Updated nwt_grd.py as follows, and it passes:
>> tst2 = gdaltest.GDALTest( 'NWT_GRD', 'nwt_grd.grd', 2, 33690 )
>> status2 = tst2.testOpen()
>> tst3 = gdaltest.GDALTest( 'NWT_GRD', 'nwt_grd.grd', 3, 20365 )
>> status
.testOpen()
tst3 = gdaltest.GDALTest( 'NWT_GRD', 'nwt_grd.grd', 3, 20365 )
status3 = tst3.testOpen()
Please let me know if any more verification is required. Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le jeudi 27 août 2015 12:23:07, Gawade P a écrit :
27, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le jeudi 27 août 2015 06:20:41, Gawade P a écrit :
>> Good Morning, Even.
>> I debugged this more, focusing, as you suggested, on the computation
>> of the colormap and looks like the difference in the value of the
>> checksum
Good Morning, Even.
I debugged this more, focusing, as you suggested, on the computation
of the colormap and looks like the difference in the value of the
checksum is due to the difference in calculation of the color map
values for negative slopes. The following lines of code in
frmts/northwood/no
Thanks, Even. I will dig into this more based on your inputs.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le mardi 25 août 2015 07:28:46, Gawade P a écrit :
>> Hi Even,
>> It looks like I am running into another checksum issue on ppc64le.
>>
>> Output o
and 3. I am looking at the code in
frmts/northwood/grddataset.cpp. Would this be the right place?
Would you recommend raising an issue for this one as well? Please suggest.
Thanks !
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Gawade P wrote:
> Raised ticket at: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6082#tic
Raised ticket at: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6082#ticket
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le lundi 24 août 2015 10:58:49, Gawade P a écrit :
>> Thanks, Even!
>> This change solved the issue I was seeing. Appreciate your help on this!
>
> Great.
1147 1395 1395 1395 1403 1403
>> 1428 1651 1684 1891 1924
>> 165 404 412 635 875 875 875 883 908 1123 1139 1379 1379 1387 1395
>> 1412 1651 1882 1915 2163
>> 189 429 652 652 677 883 900 1114 1123 1139 1370 1379 1379 1387 1635
>> 1668 1891 1899 1924
22, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le vendredi 21 août 2015 07:01:41, Gawade P a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am performing the following operation on a Fedora 21 ppc64le machine:
>>
>> gdal_translate -of HF2 byte.tif byte.tif.tst
>>
>> Here byte.
Hi All,
I am performing the following operation on a Fedora 21 ppc64le machine:
gdal_translate -of HF2 byte.tif byte.tif.tst
Here byte.tiff is TIFF image data
[root@pts0433-vm12 test]# file byte.tif
byte.tif: TIFF image data, little-endian, direntries=15, height=20,
bps=8, compression=none, Pho
13 matches
Mail list logo
