Hello GDAL-DEV,
I apologize if this information is available somewhere in the GDAL
documentation, but I haven't been able to find an answer in that
documentation yet.
I am currently working on a routine to export PDFs. In addition to a
projection system -- from a WKT string -- I have geotransform
Michael,
I noticed you said the following:
"I am linking statically to GDAL built as a static library with vcpkg
(which builds without error)."
I may be interpreting this incorrectly, but it sounds like you intend to
link the NCSEcw library. However, I believe your ECW_LIBRARY variable
reference
All,
I just wanted to follow up on this thread to report how we solved this
issue. Using vcpkg we were able to create a custom build of GDAL 3.10.0
that statically links Proj. We have a new build script using vcpkg. This
seems to have improved our build process, but the proof will be in how easy
i
Parveen,
My company builds with vcpkg so this might not be applicable to you. But
using the DGDAL_LIB_OUTPUT_NAME option I am able to specify the name of the
output dll and lib file for our build. Here is how I set this option for
our build:
-DGDAL_LIB_OUTPUT_NAME=gdal3100
This worked for us for
Parveen,
I apologize, but that I can't confirm. I only have the information I gave
you. I hope someone else is able to weigh in though, as I am interested in
this information as well,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:27 PM Parveen Sharma
wrote:
> Thanks
>
> What about the PDFium git repo which I menti
Parveen,
A couple of years ago my company used the following options to generate a
GDAL PDF dynamic driver for GDAL 3.7.0:
-DGDAL_ENABLE_DRIVER_PDF_PLUGIN=ON
-DGDAL_USE_PDFIUM=ON
-DPDFIUM_INCLUDE_DIR="%~dp0ExtractPDFium\install\include\pdfium"
-DPDFIUM_LIBRARY="%~dp0ExtractPDFium\install\lib\pdfi
All,
On Robert C.'s advice I am currently investigating using vcpkg to fulfill
my company's build requirements. I haven't successfully managed to build
GDAL to our specifications yet. But if I do, I will make sure to post
details to this thread,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:52 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
u estimate this
update would take? Also, is there any chance you could share any of your
scripts so I could compare them to ours?
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:09 PM Greg Troxel via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> David Klaus via gdal-dev writes:
>
> > I am reaching out
Dear GDAL-DEV Community,
I apologize if this isn’t the right forum for this inquiry. If so, please
feel free to disregard this email.
*Current Problem:*
I am reaching out for advice on streamlining the process my company uses to
produce new versions of GDAL for our releases. Currently, we mainta
All,
I've cleaned up the code I have as best I can. I removed all the code
specific to our codebase and tried to remove a lot of extraneous settings.
This will still require that the user set a few environment variables that
will be specific to their system. Hopefully the comments I added make it
All,
If I understand correctly. Before we do anything else, we should try to
rebuilt our GDAL solution such that it uses at least Proj4 9.2.0, do I have
that right? Does anyone happen to know the minimum GDAL version compatible
with Proj4 9.2.0?
P.S. I am still working on the code example to repe
sformations
> Le 15/07/2024 à 17:46, David Klaus via gdal-dev a écrit :
>
> Greg,
>
> Thank you for that information. I will post my example code shortly.
> Hopefully there is an obvious mistake in my code that is not related to
> Proj4 or GDAL version,
>
> On Mon, Jul 1
Greg,
Thank you for that information. I will post my example code shortly.
Hopefully there is an obvious mistake in my code that is not related to
Proj4 or GDAL version,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:40 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
> David Klaus writes:
>
> > As far as upgrading Proj4; because we build
Greg,
Thank you for that information. I'll put together some example code and
post that shortly.
As far as upgrading Proj4; because we build Proj4 statically in our custom
build, it's not a trivial task to upgrade versions. Also, I think there
might be compatibility reasons why we've stuck with 6
Hello,
I apologize if this is not the correct forum for this question. I am
currently trying to determine the cause of some strange behavior I've
encountered when running a custom build of GDAL that my company uses. To
be clear I don't think the behavior is a bug on GDAL's part, but I think
that
15 matches
Mail list logo
