Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.11.0 "Eganville" beta1 available for testing

On the following page: https://gdal.org/en/latest/programs/gdal_raster_calc.html#gdal-raster-calc-subcommand Example 3 at the very bottom has: gdal_calc -i I think it should be: gdal raster calc -i ...like example 1 and 2? Scott On 4/17/25 12:03, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Hi

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.11.0 "Eganville" beta1 available for testing

Even Rouault writes: > No, std::abs() is fine there. Fixed per > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/2d169a75c24aece05be9bba588d50bc055e9b9ac great, thanks. > Those ones are related to the use of the old PCRE library. Should be > fixed per > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/0e38a13e0c7784d

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.11.0 "Eganville" beta1 available for testing

Greg, those errors are related to the new float16 (RFC100) support. Support for that type is a bit weak with some compilers / C/C++ libraries. Can you give a try at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/12165 ? Even Le 18/04/2025 à 01:00, Greg Troxel via gdal-dev a écrit : Even Rouault via gda

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.11.0 "Eganville" beta1 available for testing

Even Rouault via gdal-dev writes: > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/v3.11.0beta1/NEWS.md I'm seeing errors on two or three files about what I think is referring to std::isinf and std::isnan with just isinf and isnan. Adding std:: before isinf/isnan seems to make it build. And, I see existin

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

Thanks for the explanation. I'm +1 on pro subscriptions for GDAL and PROJ. The extra number of runners (6 in pro vs 2 in the current plan) will also be helpful for GDAL. Dan On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 4:30 PM Howard Butler wrote: > > > > On Apr 17, 2025, at 2:10 PM, Daniel Baston wrote: > > > > H

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

> On Apr 17, 2025, at 2:10 PM, Daniel Baston wrote: > > Hi Howard, > > I agree that RTD is useful for our project. Given the recent funding for two > documentation contributors, the pull request previews that RTD provides will > be especially helpful. > > Still, I'd argue the project most e

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

Hi Howard, I agree that RTD is useful for our project. Given the recent funding for two documentation contributors, the pull request previews that RTD provides will be especially helpful. Still, I'd argue the project most essential for our docs is Sphinx itself. Do you know if/how dollars sent to

[gdal-dev] GDAL 3.11.0 "Eganville" beta1 available for testing

Hi, I've prepared a beta1 of GDAL 3.11.0 to get feedback from early testers, for the following next 2 weeks before the release candidate. The NEWS file is here: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/v3.11.0beta1/NEWS.md The biggest highlight is: * RFC 104

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

+1 KurtS On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:39 AM Howard Butler via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Dear PSC, > > GDAL and PROJ depend upon ReadTheDocs for documentation generation and > hosting. RTD does not charge for open source projects to host > documentation. Projects can pay $60/yr to

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

+1 Daniel On 2025-04-17 12:39, Howard Butler via gdal-dev wrote: Dear PSC, GDAL and PROJ depend upon ReadTheDocs for documentation generation and hosting. RTD does not charge for open source projects to host documentation. Projects can pay $60/yr to have ads removed, which we do, but we can

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

+1 Mike On 4/17/25, 12:45 PM, "gdal-dev on behalf of Howard Butler via gdal-dev" mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > wrote: Dear PSC, GDAL and PROJ depend upon ReadTheDocs for documentation generation and hosti

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

RTD is indispensable! +1 ftom me. Sean Gillies On Thu, Apr 17, 2025, 10:39 AM Howard Butler via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Dear PSC, > > GDAL and PROJ depend upon ReadTheDocs for documentation generation and > hosting. RTD does not charge for open source projects to host > doc

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev käyttäjän Howard Butler via gdal-dev puolesta Lähetetty: Torstai 17. huhtikuuta 2025 19.39 Vastaanottaja: gdal dev Aihe: [gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support Dear PSC, GDAL and PROJ depend upon ReadThe

[gdal-dev] Motion: ReadTheDocs Financial Support

Dear PSC, GDAL and PROJ depend upon ReadTheDocs for documentation generation and hosting. RTD does not charge for open source projects to host documentation. Projects can pay $60/yr to have ads removed, which we do, but we can do more. Given how important RTD is to our projects' operations, I w