[gdal-dev] Hi: GDAL CONFIG

2024-12-17 Thread Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
Hi, Have you tried set GDAL_HTTP_USERPWD=user:pass -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Michal Kowalczuk via gdal-dev Lähetetty: tiistai 17. joulukuuta 2024 19.49 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: [gdal-dev] GDAL CONFIG Dear GDAL colleagues, do you have any idea why the

[gdal-dev] GDAL CONFIG

2024-12-17 Thread Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev
Dear GDAL colleagues, do you have any idea why the first method fails: *set GDAL_HTTP_USERPWD="user:pass"* *gdal_translate -srcwin 0 0 1073696614, 1073741824 -outsize 512 512 "WMS:https://maps.lantmateriet.se/topowebb/wms/v1?SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=topowebbkartan&SRS=epsg:3

Re: [gdal-dev] Dead link in docs

2024-12-17 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Thanks. Fixed Le 17/12/2024 à 17:45, Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev a écrit : Just inform about dead link in docs: https://gdal.org/en/stable/api/cpl.html#_CPPv418CPLSetConfigOptionPKcPKc http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/ConfigOptions ___

[gdal-dev] Dead link in docs

2024-12-17 Thread Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev
Just inform about dead link in docs: https://gdal.org/en/stable/api/cpl.html#_CPPv418CPLSetConfigOptionPKcPKc http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/ConfigOptions ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-d

Re: [gdal-dev] Which options to use to avoid the symbol clash between GDAL and external libgeotiff and external TIFF libraries

2024-12-17 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Le 17/12/2024 à 15:12, Parveen Sharma a écrit : Thanks Even I believe this wasn't the case in older GDAL releases for eg release 3.3 where we had an requirement to explicitly set options to avoid symbol clash? yes, but obviously nobody any longer use such antiquated and unsupported version

Re: [gdal-dev] Which options to use to avoid the symbol clash between GDAL and external libgeotiff and external TIFF libraries

2024-12-17 Thread Parveen Sharma via gdal-dev
Thanks Even I believe this wasn't the case in older GDAL releases for eg release 3.3 where we had an requirement to explicitly set options to avoid symbol clash? From: Even Rouault Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:49 PM To: Parveen Sharma ; Michał Kowalcz

Re: [gdal-dev] Which options to use to avoid the symbol clash between GDAL and external libgeotiff and external TIFF libraries

2024-12-17 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
You don't need to set any explicit option for symbol renaming. This is done automatically as soon as internal libraries are used Le 17/12/2024 à 10:57, Parveen Sharma via gdal-dev a écrit : Hello I am trying to build GDAL 3.9.3 using CMAKE and want to avoid the *symbol clash between GDAL and

[gdal-dev] GDAL-GRASS GIS driver 1.0.3 release candidate released

2024-12-17 Thread Nicklas Larsson via gdal-dev
The GDAL-GRASS driver 1.0.3rc1 release provides more than 25 improvements and fixes with respect to the release 1.0.2. Highlights: - CMake support added - Autoconf configure updated to version 2.71, with a number of fixes - Migrate use of deprecated GDAL driver registration API - Remove use of ob

[gdal-dev] Which options to use to avoid the symbol clash between GDAL and external libgeotiff and external TIFF libraries

2024-12-17 Thread Parveen Sharma via gdal-dev
Hello I am trying to build GDAL 3.9.3 using CMAKE and want to avoid the symbol clash between GDAL and external libgeotiff and external TIFF libraries. I have enabled the GDAL internal TIFF and GEOTIFF with below CMAKE options But i am confused which of the below is valid option to rename th