[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 103 - OGR_SCHEMA open option

2024-11-26 Thread ElPaso via gdal-dev
Hi, Motion: Adopt RFC 103: OGR_SCHEMA open option[1] I have updated the RFC [1] with: - updated JSON schema with field rename support - removed GDAL_DMD_OGR_SCHEMA_OPEN_OPTION_FLAGS (after talking to Even about using DMD_OPEN_OPTION_LIST instead) There is also a complete candidate impleme

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review on RFC 104: Adding a "gdal" front-end command line interface

2024-11-26 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Hi, are there further comments on the RFC before I submit it to vote ? There's now a candidate implementation in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11303 with tests + docs that implements "gdal raster info", "gdal raster convert", "gdal vector info", "gdal vector convert", "gdal vector pipeli

Re: [gdal-dev] Stacks versus mosaics with GTI Driver

2024-11-26 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Hi, The GTI driver indeed doesn't support -separate type of datasets. It would mean it would have to ingest the whole "index" at opening, so apart from a reduction in size of the index compared to VRT, you'd likely have little benefits. If you have really a lot of bands (like 100k or more), G

[gdal-dev] Stacks versus mosaics with GTI Driver

2024-11-26 Thread Scott Henderson via gdal-dev
Hello all, I have a question on scope of the GTI driver, which I think provides a really nice capability for a lightweight single file raster catalog! One very common pattern I use and often see others using is `gdalbuildvrt -separate stack.vrt *.tif` for approximately-coincident satellite im