Il 09/10/24 00:55, Greg Troxel via gdal-dev ha scritto:
ElPaso via gdal-dev writes:
I have read the discussion on lwn and I must say that I am more in
line with the debian position.
My view is that code that comes out of generative AI should be viewed as
an improper derived work, and lacking
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024, Greg Troxel via gdal-dev wrote:
ElPaso via gdal-dev writes:
I find it ironic that as an open source developer who probably
contributed a lot of training material to feed the AI model I myself
am banned to use it.
It's not ironic; it's taking the high moral ground and acti
ElPaso via gdal-dev writes:
> I have read the discussion on lwn and I must say that I am more in
> line with the debian position.
My view is that code that comes out of generative AI should be viewed as
an improper derived work, and lacking adequate provenance/permission to
be added to an open s
Sorry to butt in.
I have no say in this whatsoever.
A few mayhaps/perby useful points:
- not using GAI is not a lasting option, so rather focus on precautions and
be aware of dangers.
Prime danger, to me, seams copyright trolling ala Oracle. They have
bought/adopted stuff in order to sue people.
Of
> On Oct 7, 2024, at 11:38 AM, Even Rouault via gdal-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose we update RFC 8 with the following changes:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10958
>
> Can we enforce that? No (similarly we can't prevent someone from stealing
> copyrighted material from source co
While I am at it - the stuff about "changes that are not subject to
copyright law" is meaningless - copyright applies to content and not to
changes and I doubt there is any content on GDAL that is NOT subject to
copyright law.
I would humbly suggest that the question is more about whether
"correct
IANAL - however I have looked at a lot of these things in my time.
The phrase "use of generative AI tools to contribute copyrighted material
is prohibited" is ambiguous (and actually nugatory):
- for clarity - it should say that it is prohibited to use such tools to
contribute *to the project* ot
Hi,
> At the moment I am using copilot as a cut-and-paste on steroids and it
> has improved my efficiency, to me it is no different than copying and
> pasting from another file in the GDAL source code or going to SO to
> search how to write a complex recursive lambda implementation in C++11,
>
Il 07/10/24 18:38, Even Rouault via gdal-dev ha scritto:
Hi,
I propose we update RFC 8 with the following changes:
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10958
Can we enforce that? No (similarly we can't prevent someone from
stealing copyrighted material from source code of proprietary software
