Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Renew Even Rouault GDAL Maintainer Contract

2024-09-12 Thread Frank Warmerdam via gdal-dev
A belated +1! On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 9:19 PM Howard Butler via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Declaring this motion passed with +1s from Sean, Jukka, Daniel, Javier, > Kurt, and Howard. We technically needed the contract active to pay Even's > previous invoice so I am fast-tracki

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Renew Even Rouault GDAL Maintainer Contract

2024-09-12 Thread Howard Butler via gdal-dev
Declaring this motion passed with +1s from Sean, Jukka, Daniel, Javier, Kurt, and Howard. We technically needed the contract active to pay Even's previous invoice so I am fast-tracking the vote as it appears non-controversial ;) > On Sep 11, 2024, at 10:50 PM, Scott via gdal-dev > wrote: > >

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_edit.py question

2024-09-12 Thread Scott via gdal-dev
Thanks Even! The NETCDF file(s) I'm working with have hundreds of sub data sets. Initially, I was breaking out all of them to .vrt's as you suggested, but it got a bit messy. Counting the sub-datasets with gdalinfo iteratively then using gdal_create -bands N was a lot cleaner. Passing dozens

Re: [gdal-dev] gdal_edit.py question

2024-09-12 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Scott, # add another tif to band 2 and add meta data for it: gdalwarp -q -srcband 1 -dstband 2 -t_srs EPSG:4326 src2.tif result.tif BAND1 is lost at that stage. gdalwarp must override the metadata of the output dataset with the one of src2.tif. Presumably it should instead merge them, using

[gdal-dev] gdal_edit.py question

2024-09-12 Thread Scott via gdal-dev
Greetings, I need some help with gdal_edit. If I add meta data each time I add a band to a raster, only the last meta edit is present. Here's the scenario GDAL 3.9.1, gdal_edit.py is 3.6.2, Debian 12: # create empty 2-band raster with existing prototype: gdal_create -if src1.tif -bands 2 resu

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Renew Even Rouault GDAL Maintainer Contract

2024-09-12 Thread Simon Eves via gdal-dev
+100 On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 6:15 AM Sean Gillies via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Absolutely yes +1 > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 8:24 PM Howard Butler via gdal-dev < > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > >> PSC, >> >> I am motioning to renew Even's maintainer contract through the GD

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve RFC 101 "Raster dataset read-only thread-safety"

2024-09-12 Thread Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
+1 Javier On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 08:27, Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > +1 > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > -Alkuperäinen viesti- > Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Even > Rouault via gdal-dev > Lähetetty: keskiviikko 11. syyskuuta 2024 22.27 > Vastaanottaja: gdal-d

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve RFC 101 "Raster dataset read-only thread-safety"

2024-09-12 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Mika, Le 12/09/2024 à 09:22, Heiskanen Mika (FMI) via gdal-dev a écrit : * Ah, and one thing I realized is that OGRSpatialReference isn't thread-safe, so I've also added an optional SetThreadSafe() on it, to also use a per-instance mutex in multi-threaded scenarios (cf commit

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Renew Even Rouault GDAL Maintainer Contract

2024-09-12 Thread Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
Absolutely yes +1 On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 8:24 PM Howard Butler via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > PSC, > > I am motioning to renew Even's maintainer contract through the GDAL > Sponsorship Program that is hosted by NumFOCUS for another year. > > /me starts with a +1 > > Howard > ___

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS supported SRS

2024-09-12 Thread Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
Hi, Your suggestion to utilize the additional layer BBOXes if they exist feels good to me, and better than to use the first advertised SRS from the root level. Beyond that what can be done with parsing the GetCapabilities is limited in my mind, because all projections which are supported may no

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS supported SRS

2024-09-12 Thread Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev
So we remain at the point that there is no good method that, using only GDAL, will allow to fully use the WMS service without additional work related to XML parsing...? Best, Michał Kowalczuk wt., 10 wrz 2024 o 17:06 Michał Kowalczuk napisał(a): > A sample from your link: > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve RFC 101 "Raster dataset read-only thread-safety"

2024-09-12 Thread Heiskanen Mika (FMI) via gdal-dev
* Ah, and one thing I realized is that OGRSpatialReference isn't thread-safe, so I've also added an optional SetThreadSafe() on it, to also use a per-instance mutex in multi-threaded scenarios (cf commit https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10746/commits/c7e1862273dd018e58a01f25b21fdff6dbfdd1cd)