Hi everyone, this is my first post. I've also posted this to
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78751101/labelling-contour-lines-with-ogr-style
I'm trying to add labels to DEM contour lines.
I'm working with GDAL 3.6.2. , which I installed using Anaconda . I have
some DEM data from USGS which I
All,
I've cleaned up the code I have as best I can. I removed all the code
specific to our codebase and tried to remove a lot of extraneous settings.
This will still require that the user set a few environment variables that
will be specific to their system. Hopefully the comments I added make it
All,
If I understand correctly. Before we do anything else, we should try to
rebuilt our GDAL solution such that it uses at least Proj4 9.2.0, do I have
that right? Does anyone happen to know the minimum GDAL version compatible
with Proj4 9.2.0?
P.S. I am still working on the code example to repe
Hi,
hopefully this proposed improvement of the developer doc
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10427 should answer your questions
Even
Le 14/07/2024 à 21:57, Thomas Larsen Wessel via gdal-dev a écrit :
It's hard for me to understand the structure of the repository. Is
there any documentatio
David Klaus writes:
> Thank you for the input. You don't happen to know where I can find
> documentation on these NADCON5 related changes?
I would suggest reading the 9.2.0 release notes.
There is a link to a merged PR which has further discussion.
The tl;dr; is that proj matches NGS tools. Wh
Even,
Thank you for the input. You don't happen to know where I can find
documentation on these NADCON5 related changes?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 12:30 PM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Support for US datum transformations has been vastly improved in PROJ
> 9.2.0 with NADCON5 grid based transformations
>
Support for US datum transformations has been vastly improved in PROJ
9.2.0 with NADCON5 grid based transformations
Le 15/07/2024 à 17:46, David Klaus via gdal-dev a écrit :
Greg,
Thank you for that information. I will post my example code shortly.
Hopefully there is an obvious mistake in my
Greg,
Thank you for that information. I will post my example code shortly.
Hopefully there is an obvious mistake in my code that is not related to
Proj4 or GDAL version,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:40 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
> David Klaus writes:
>
> > As far as upgrading Proj4; because we build
David Klaus writes:
> As far as upgrading Proj4; because we build Proj4 statically in our custom
> build, it's not a trivial task to upgrade versions. Also, I think there
> might be compatibility reasons why we've stuck with 6.3.1 up until now.
>
> But if NAD83 realization transformation function
Greg,
Thank you for that information. I'll put together some example code and
post that shortly.
As far as upgrading Proj4; because we build Proj4 statically in our custom
build, it's not a trivial task to upgrade versions. Also, I think there
might be compatibility reasons why we've stuck with 6
You didn't, as far as I can tell, post the code that is not doing what
you want. Or perhaps turn that code into a small test case program.
People reading that would be able to be more helpful, and the code
example could help others.
Proj 6.3 is quite old. I recommend you update to the latest re
Hello,
I apologize if this is not the correct forum for this question. I am
currently trying to determine the cause of some strange behavior I've
encountered when running a custom build of GDAL that my company uses. To
be clear I don't think the behavior is a bug on GDAL's part, but I think
that
12 matches
Mail list logo
