Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.9: How to pass negative flag values to GDALArgumentParser?

2024-07-01 Thread Craig de Stigter via gdal-dev
A colleague has noticed a workaround: prefix the argument with a space: $ gdalwarp '-dstnodata' ' -inf' ... On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 16:04, Craig de Stigter < craig.destig...@koordinates.com> wrote: > While trying to upgrade to GDAL 3.9 i'm hitting this error: > > $ gdalwarp '-dstnodata' '-inf' ..

[gdal-dev] GDAL 3.9: How to pass negative flag values to GDALArgumentParser?

2024-07-01 Thread Craig de Stigter via gdal-dev
While trying to upgrade to GDAL 3.9 i'm hitting this error: $ gdalwarp '-dstnodata' '-inf' ... ERROR 1: Too few arguments for '-dstnodata'. ... The same happens with `gdalbuildvrt -vrtnodata '-1 -1 -1' ...` We use negative values for NODATA in a few places because they're unlikely to already be

Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: WMTS huge difference in performance - cache issue

2024-07-01 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Michał, Le 01/07/2024 à 18:49, Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev a écrit : Did my email reached gdal mailing list? yes, it did. I just had a look There's indeed an issue in the WMTS driver which I've ticketed at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/10348 . See bottom of the ticket for a workaro

Re: [gdal-dev] Expected runtime of polygonize (GDAL 3.9.0) for few very large features.

2024-07-01 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
I’m able to share the problematic tile(s) if of interest, Yes, please do Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gda

[gdal-dev] Fwd: WMTS huge difference in performance - cache issue

2024-07-01 Thread Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev
Did my email reached gdal mailing list? Regards Michal -- Wiadomość przekazana dalej -- Od: Michał Kowalczuk Data: pt., 28.06.2024 o 14:59 Temat: WMTS huge difference in performance - cache issue Do: Hi, I have two sample WMTS servers. The first is a Polish geoportal: https://mapy.geop

[gdal-dev] Expected runtime of polygonize (GDAL 3.9.0) for few very large features.

2024-07-01 Thread Meyer, Jesse R. (GSFC-618.0)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] via gdal-dev
Hi, We’ve encountered a few images with what seems like pathological performance problems with polygonise. The details below are a report from another developer that I haven’t yet independently verified. We threshold a raster image to a binary mask in a memory dataset, use that as its own mas