Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: ok, so the exception occurs in the embedded copy of tinyxml inside the ECW SDK ? You likely need to apply those community patches to your libecwjp2 3.3 sources: https://github.com/rouault/libecwj2-3.3-builds/blob/main/libecwj2-3.3.patch

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL & CAD Files

2024-06-25 Thread Michał Kowalczuk via gdal-dev
First of all, the dwg format is only available in gdal if you buy ODA SDK which is very expensive. To omit this you can switch to DXF format which is built-in by default in gdal. https://www.opendesign.com/pricing https://gdal.org/drivers/vector/dxf.html Regards, Michal W dniu wt., 25.06.2024 o

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL & CAD Files

2024-06-25 Thread Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
https://gdal.org/drivers/vector/dwg.html says: > DWG files are considered to have no georeferencing information through OGR >From https://gdal.org/programs/ogr2ogr.html, you will need to specify the spatial reference system / projection with "-s_srs" -Kurt On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:55 PM Ashly

[gdal-dev] GDAL & CAD Files

2024-06-25 Thread Ashlyn Powell via gdal-dev
Hello GDAL Devs, I am new to using GDAL, and I just don't know enough about it yet. I am working with thousands of CAD files (DWG) to extract a project boundary line then export it out as a KML. I would love to automate this process. Does GDAL have the capability to work with DWG files? Has anyon

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
ok, so the exception occurs in the embedded copy of tinyxml inside the ECW SDK ? You likely need to apply those community patches to your libecwjp2 3.3 sources: https://github.com/rouault/libecwj2-3.3-builds/blob/main/libecwj2-3.3.patch Le 25/06/2024 à 18:42, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Le 25/06/2024 à 16:52, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault wrote: Le 25/06/2024 à 16:25, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Can you run "gdb autotest/cpp/testclo

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Le 25/06/2024 à 16:52, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault wrote: Le 25/06/2024 à 16:25, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Can you run "gdb autotest/cpp/testclosedondestroydm" , "run" , and when it crashed "bt" so

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault wrote: Le 25/06/2024 à 16:25, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Can you run "gdb autotest/cpp/testclosedondestroydm" , "run" , and when it crashed "bt" so we have a backtrace of where it crashes  (all of that

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Le 25/06/2024 à 16:25, Andrew C Aitchison a écrit : On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Can you run "gdb autotest/cpp/testclosedondestroydm" , "run" , and when it crashed "bt" so we have a backtrace of where it crashes  (all of that after running "source ../scripts/setdevenv

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Can you run "gdb autotest/cpp/testclosedondestroydm" , "run" , and when it crashed "bt" so we have a backtrace of where it crashes  (all of that after running "source ../scripts/setdevenv.sh") It doesn't crash: (gdb) run Starting program:

Re: [gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Even Rouault via gdal-dev
Can you run "gdb autotest/cpp/testclosedondestroydm" , "run" , and when it crashed "bt" so we have a backtrace of where it crashes  (all of that after running "source ../scripts/setdevenv.sh") Le 25/06/2024 à 15:14, Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev a écrit : This is not a new failure, so thre

[gdal-dev] testclosedondestroydm.test

2024-06-25 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
This is not a new failure, so thre is no need for this to hold up 3.9.1. System: Ubuntu 24-04/Noble on Intel x86-64. # ctest --output-on-failure 8< 8< 8< 8< 8< 8< 8< 28/51 Test #28: test-closed-on-destroy-DM ***Failed0.19 sec [==] R