I see this note about
GDALTranslateOptionsSetMetadataOptions()
GDALTranslateOptionsAddMetadataOptions()
which don't seem to exist. Is that just an outdated comment?
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/8122e2c39f72317a803cd24ee1fb5d6a44a97596/apps/gdal_translate_lib.cpp#L200-L201
Thanks!
On W
Le 21/09/2023 à 01:12, Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís a écrit :
Remove spatial_ref WKT export in netCDF driver (GDAL 4) #4712
Would this mean all codes that use spatial_ref would be broken
yes, spatial_ref is AFAIK a GDAL specific thing that predates the
introduction of crs_wkt in the CF
Remove spatial_ref WKT export in netCDF driver (GDAL 4) #4712
Would this mean all codes that use spatial_ref would be broken
Just hope that I'm misunderstanding it.
Joaquim
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev On Behalf Of Even Rouault
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 9:32 PM
To
Hi,
following latest discussions on RFC 95, I've drafted
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/8440 with a few ideas. Please add
yours into it. We should focus on listing breaking changes, rather than
new features that can be developed without involving breakage.
Even
--
http://www.spatialys
Sean Gillies writes:
> I'm in favor of overhauling the types in the next major version. However,
> I'm not convinced we need to jump immediately to 4.0. The current situation
> isn't ideal, but isn't holding us back very much right? GDAL is growing new
> features rapidly and it doesn't seem that
I've asked before about making GDAL's error propagation system better.
That's one thing I'd like to add to a list of proposed changes for 4.0.
Could we have a separate call for 4.0 ideas and review it next month (or
later)? I'm so busy with a running project and looking for a new job that I
don't h
Welcome aboard, Javier! I'm looking forward to working with you.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 4:08 AM Javier Jimenez Shaw
wrote:
> Thank you! It is an honour being part of the PSC. :D
>
> On Wed, 20 Sept 2023 at 10:47, Even Rouault
> wrote:
>
>> Motion passed with +1 from PSC members MateuszL, Howar
Hi Even,
I'm in favor of overhauling the types in the next major version.
However, I'm not convinced we need to jump immediately to 4.0. The
current situation isn't ideal, but isn't holding us back very much right?
No, there's no urgency. It is just one of the many continuous rather
boring im
Hi Even,
I'm in favor of overhauling the types in the next major version. However,
I'm not convinced we need to jump immediately to 4.0. The current situation
isn't ideal, but isn't holding us back very much right? GDAL is growing new
features rapidly and it doesn't seem that the old types have be
Thank you! It is an honour being part of the PSC. :D
On Wed, 20 Sept 2023 at 10:47, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Motion passed with +1 from PSC members MateuszL, HowardB, JukkaR, KurtS,
> FrankW, DanielM and me.
>
> Congrats Javier! You can file a PR to add yourself to
> https://gdal.org/community/inde
Motion passed with +1 from PSC members MateuszL, HowardB, JukkaR, KurtS,
FrankW, DanielM and me.
Congrats Javier! You can file a PR to add yourself to
https://gdal.org/community/index.html#psc
Le 16/09/2023 à 13:31, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to nominate Javier Jiménez Shaw for
Sounds OK to me
Le 20/09/2023 à 02:32, Michael Sumner a écrit :
Thanks Even, could add a AttachDomainMetadata here that expected
"-dmo DOMAIN:META-TAG=VALUE"
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/a4b57c22606be2258196a933d310f301e3ece93f/apps/gdal_translate_lib.cpp#L2625
I'll try that, or is it
12 matches
Mail list logo