Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: add Javier Jiménez Shaw to GDAL PSC

2023-09-16 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Even Rouault Lähetetty: lauantai 16. syyskuuta 2023 14.32 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: [gdal-dev] Motion: add Javier Jiménez Shaw to GDAL PSC Hi, I would like to nominate Javier Jiménez Shaw for GDA

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: add Javier Jiménez Shaw to GDAL PSC

2023-09-16 Thread Howard Butler
+1 Howard > On Sep 16, 2023, at 6:38 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > +1 Mateusz > > > On Sat, 16 Sept 2023, 13:32 Even Rouault, wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to nominate Javier Jiménez Shaw for GDAL PSC membership. > Javier has been involved with GDAL for quite a time now, as a responsive >

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion/review of RFC95: Use standard C/C++ integer types

2023-09-16 Thread Even Rouault
About GDAL 4.0 vs 3.8, I'm fine with 4.0. But I do not know if "users" will expect a bigger change in functionalities for a mayor release update. Yes, there are a few other tickets flagged as appropriate for 4.0: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/milestone/33 All of them could probably be impl

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: add Javier Jiménez Shaw to GDAL PSC

2023-09-16 Thread Mateusz Loskot
+1 Mateusz On Sat, 16 Sept 2023, 13:32 Even Rouault, wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to nominate Javier Jiménez Shaw for GDAL PSC membership. > Javier has been involved with GDAL for quite a time now, as a responsive > user & ticket reporter, and has occasionally contributed fixes. Javier > is w

[gdal-dev] Motion: add Javier Jiménez Shaw to GDAL PSC

2023-09-16 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I would like to nominate Javier Jiménez Shaw for GDAL PSC membership. Javier has been involved with GDAL for quite a time now, as a responsive user & ticket reporter, and has occasionally contributed fixes. Javier is well anchored in our ecosystem, with deep knowledge of CRS topics and PR

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion/review of RFC95: Use standard C/C++ integer types

2023-09-16 Thread Javier Jimenez Shaw
It sounds reasonable to me. I agree with Kurt answers (about Q3 I have not opinion). (btw, I have no vote) About GDAL 4.0 vs 3.8, I'm fine with 4.0. But I do not know if "users" will expect a bigger change in functionalities for a mayor release update. Cheers, Javier. PS I always liked those full